Correction: A Feb. 22 column by Lorraine Ahearn about the not guilty verdict in the trial of Greensboro Police Detective Scott Sanders contained two errors. First, the interviews of residents by Sanders referred to in the column took place in Peggy Barker’s past neighborhood, not the neighborhood that David Wray and Barker were both living in at the time of the interviews. Second, there is no indication that Barker left the condominium close to Wray because of the actions of Sanders in interviewing neighbors in the past neighborhood.
The state prosecutor who got a not-guilty verdict in the trial of a Special Intelligence detective under former police chief David Wray gave no interviews on the courthouse steps Friday, didn't stop for a photo op.
In fact, other than saying he would drop all related charges in the interest of justice and letting Greensboro "heal" after its long ordeal, Senior Deputy Attorney General Jim Coman answered just two questions. His responses were passed on a scribbled note via Coman's SBI agent in charge.
My two questions weren't about the not-guilty verdict on the charge of "illegal access to a government computer" against Scott Sanders, who is expected to be reinstated to his job at the police department Monday.
No, my questions were about Peggy Barker, a troublesome neighbor to then-chief Wray, and a strange, forgotten footnote to this four-year saga. Forgotten, that is, until Coman brought her up when cross-examining Sanders, the detective who reported to Wray's longtime friend and right-hand man, then-deputy chief Randall Brady.
After Barker, who had a history of psychological problems, called the FBI with outlandish stories about Wray, the deputy chief assigned Sanders to investigate the neighbor and have her removed from the condos where Wray lived on Banking Street. The deputy chief, unaware that his detective was recording the entire conversation, then proceeded to lay out tactics for how Barker's eviction might be accomplished.
Years later in 2007, as a widening police scandal swirled and City Hall became desperate to give a bitterly divided city and police department some sense of what was at the core of this protracted, ugly, confusing scandal, City Council members held up the Barker tapes as a "blueprint" for how Wray's inner circle operated.
The City Council, offering a rare listen behind the near-total curtain of silence that state personnel laws imposed on the Wray affair, convened a public meeting one evening and played seven minutes of audio from the hundreds of hours of audio found on Sanders' computer hard drive. Sanders testified Thursday that he routinely recorded conversations.
One tape the council played had Brady instructing Sanders on how to rid Wray of the bothersome neighbor. On the second tape, Sanders is in Wray's neighborhood going door to door. The detective is heard suggesting that Barker was suspected of being a terrorist. In truth, she was not. Sanders tells the neighbors that his role in the GPD is somewhat equivalent to a CIA agent. In fact, it was not.
So the first question to Coman, after a jury struggled past an eight-hour 11-1 stalemate to reach a unanimous not-guilty verdict clearing Sanders on a relatively minor computer tampering charge, was about Barker.
Prior to her illness, Barker, now 71, was a public relations woman and once-prominent fundraiser in Republican circles. But the last we heard, she had been put out of the condo, which she sublet, soon after Sanders paid a visit to the neighbors.
Convenience store owners and panhandlers up and down Lawndale and Battleground avenues described Barker as homeless and carrying her belongings in shopping bags. She kept a post office box nearby, but a sister contacted in Charlotte said Barker did not answer letters. Nor did Barker pick up letters from myself and former News & Record staff writer Eric J.S. Townsend from the summer of 2005 onward.
The postal clerks said the police frequently came looking for her at the post office, and said Barker became fearful. By 2007, the box rental was unpaid and the mail was returned. The postal clerks feared that Barker had disappeared.
Did Coman know her whereabouts?
"Unfortunately," Coman replied in the note he passed back through an SBI agent Friday, "we have no idea."
On the audiotape, then-deputy chief Brady tells Sanders that Barker "needs to be moved on" even if Sanders must "make it look like she's done something."
However, when Sanders was on the stand Thursday and was asked if he had trumped up any evidence against Barker, Sanders emphasized, "You had to know how Deputy Brady talks," to which Coman asked, "So we should just take this as a joke?"
Sanders answered: "I know he wasn't serious."
And even though Sanders repeated in an interview Friday after the trial that he took no action and never found Barker, it is clear from the second tape played at the City Council that he followed through and visited then-chief Wray's neighborhood.
Hence, my second question to Coman: Why did Sanders' courtroom testimony not jibe with what we the public already knew from the tapes played at the City Council and broadcast into Greensboro's living rooms on Channel 13?
Coman's answer was a question.
"Are you surprised?"
And then the special prosecutor returned to Raleigh. To heal some other city's wounds.
So let me ask. Are you surprised?
Not at the verdict, that's not the question. Clearly, the jury struggled valiantly to avoid a mistrial, over a minor technical charge: accessing a federal computer without permission. They did what they thought was best.
Thanks to the jury, we now know there was no crime, and we can get back to the question the special prosecutor scribbled down.
Are you surprised?
Not that a detective taped the deputy chief. But are you surprised at the orders, which even seemed to surprise the deputy chief himself?
At the end of the taped Peggy Barker conversation, Brady, in his easygoing, philosophical country-boy way winds up on a light but rueful note:
"Amazing," he muses to the detective, "what I get paid to do. Isn't it?"
So, are you surprised?
That this was the plan for dealing with the chief's emotionally disturbed neighbor? Did anyone ever hear of the Guilford Center? Sanctuary House? Did anyone see her wandering Lawndale Avenue? Or wonder where she would go after losing her home?
As Peggy Barker's story illustrates, there is a difference between violating the law and violating our sense of common decency.
So, yes, Mr. Coman.
Some people were surprised.
Contact Lorraine Ahearn at 336-373-7334 or lorraine.ahearn@news-record.com
Not all of the newspaper's content appears online.
*There is a fee for downloading some older articles.