news-record.com

NEWS

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Should smoking marijuana be a medical option?

Sunday, January 18, 2009
(Updated 6:43 am)

Rocky Hoveland of Greensboro suffers pain from spine, neck and back injuries.

For a long time, he took prescription painkillers. But the drugs often left him dazed, if not null and void.

Then about 10 years ago, he began using marijuana to treat the pain. He found that it didn't eradicate the pain, but it made it more manageable.

"It keeps me from being in that haze of wanting to sleep all day or feeling hung over all day," he said. The prescription medications "were making me lay down, and I ain't one to lay around."

Hoveland and others like him are pushing for North Carolina to legalize cannabis for medical purposes. And they have become part of a national trend.

In November, Michigan became the 13th state to legalize marijuana for medical purposes.

That popular-vote referendum was just the most recent decision in a long-running debate: whether it should be legal for people to use, grow and sell marijuana for medicinal purposes.

On one side: sick, suffering patients, many of

whom are dying. For at least some of them, cannabis eases symptoms of illness or side effects of treatment.

On the other: a federal government that believes marijuana's benefits are too few and its side effects too risky for the drug to be legalized, even to the highly restricted level of cocaine.

Billy, a Davidson County man who didn't want his full name used , once took the prescription painkiller Dilaudid every day after lingering neck and wrist injuries, experiencing some of the same side effects as Hoveland.

Dilaudid "didn't do much" for the pain, he said. "And I got hateful. My family didn't want to be around me."

Marijuana has helped him, too, he said. "Now I'm up and around, hiking and fishing," he said. "Marijuana focuses my mind away from the pain. I'm still hurting, but it's not that important anymore."

Proponents of legalization in North Carolina are ramping up their efforts.

Representatives of the nonprofit N.C. Cannabis Patient Network have toured the state this winter, meeting with politicians, clergy and medical professionals and airing programs on local public-access TV stations.

On May 2, proponents are scheduled to march in Raleigh on behalf of legalization as part of a global one-day protest called the Million Marijuana March.

"We're looking forward to this becoming legal in this state so people can quit living in fear," said Jean Marlowe, the network's executive director. "We're returning dignity to these patients."

Marlowe, who lives in Polk County, has used marijuana since 1991 to treat muscular dystrophy, rheumatoid arthritis, degenerative disk disease, muscle spasticity and fibromyalgia. She says the authorities leave her alone because she has a letter from her doctor saying she needs medical cannabis.

Before using marijuana, she said, the side effects of her various medications left her practically disabled.

"I spent my time throwing up, dizzy," she said. "I couldn't cognize. I couldn't balance my checkbook. I spent my life in a chair, in the corner, with a trash can."

State Rep. Earl Jones, D-Guilford, introduced a bill in the 2008 legislative session to create a study commission to look at legalizing marijuana for medical purposes in North Carolina. Jones plans to reintroduce his bill this year .

"I think the legislature will do the right thing once they see it will benefit the public and they have been educated," Jones said.

But the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration remains adamantly opposed to legalizing cannabis even for medical purposes. It continues to prosecute under federal law in some other states for growing and distributing the plants.

 

l l l

 

The most comprehensive review of the possible medical benefits of marijuana remains a book-length report, "Marijuana and Medicine," published in 1999 by the Institute of Medicine . The institute is part of the National Academies, agencies that advise the government on medicine and other sciences.

That report, co-authored by a researcher at Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center, examined marijuana use with respect to five areas:

  • Pain, particularly nerve pain experienced by patients with AIDS and other diseases.
  • Nausea and vomiting, often experienced by chemotherapy patients.
  • Wasting syndrome and loss of appetite, often experienced by AIDS and cancer patients.
  • Neurological symptoms, including muscle spasticity and multiple sclerosis.
  • Glaucoma, excessive pressure in the fluid inside the eye. The condition can cause blindness.

In general, the report found that marijuana, though not a panacea, could help relieve some of these symptoms in at least some patients. In some cases, the report found, marijuana worked as well as or better than accepted treatments.

It also found that smoking treats symptoms such as pain and nausea more quickly and effectively than taking the medicine by mouth.

The report raised concerns about the long-term health effects of smoking marijuana, which, like tobacco, is associated with an increased risk of cancer. Such long-term risks probably don't matter for patients who already are dying, the report noted.

A synthetic form of marijuana's most active ingredient, THC, is available by prescription under the trade name Marinol. But it takes longer to work than inhaled marijuana smoke.

Also, taking cannabis by mouth can get patients "higher" than smoked cannabis - which many patients don't want. When THC is eaten, the liver, which smoking bypasses, breaks the psychoactive elements down into even more potent chemicals.

Another problem with synthetic oral cannabis is that it contains only a few active ingredients, while smoked marijuana contains more than 60.

The combination of those ingredients, not just one, may provide the most medical benefit, says Dr. Wilkie Wilson, director of the DukeLEARN neurological-research program at Duke University, who notes that drug companies are researching that question.

"What you need is something, maybe like an aspirator or an inhaler, that can deliver the drug better than a pill would," said Dr. Steven R. Childers, a professor of physiology and pharmacology at Wake Forest University's Bowman Gray School of Medicine. Childers co-wrote the 1999 Institute of Medicine report.

Wilson, co-author of "Buzzed: The Straight Facts About the Most Used and Abused Drugs from Alcohol to Ecstasy," says some patients prefer smoking because it gives them greater control over their dosage - they can choose to stop, or continue, at any time depending on how much relief they're getting.

***

 Childers says the 1999 report's general conclusions remain accurate. Researchers have made some incremental advances, particularly in whether cannabis can ease some symptoms of multiple sclerosis. The nonprofit National Multiple Sclerosis Society is paying for a 10-year study, which began in March.

Also, Swiss researchers found in 2006 that cannabis taken orally can ease muscle spasticity in people with spinal-cord injuries. And after promising findings in rats and mice, Israeli researchers plan human trials to determine whether cannabis may slow or halt memory loss in people with Alzheimer's disease.

But U.S. government-sponsored studies since 1999 have been few and far between. The government grows little marijuana for research and tightly restricts its use. Currently, of 768 drug-related studies sponsored by the National Institute for Drug Abuse and registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov, two pertain to medicinal marijuana.

Besides the possible direct benefits to patients, what are the arguments for legalizing medicinal cannabis?

For one thing, it may help patients for whom other drugs are ineffective or cause intolerable side effects. Its own side effects are relatively minor, the long-term cancer risk aside.

Cannabis is safer than many drugs now on the market. There has never been a documented death attributable to marijuana overdose, Wilson says.

And legalization would bring about standardized dosages and quality, aiding both treatment and research.

Critics argue that the drug is psychologically habit-forming. It can be, but it is less so than alcohol, tobacco and such drugs as heroin, the institute report found.

Some research subjects have reported unpleasant feelings or sensations after taking the drug. And some do not like the "high" that comes with taking the drug. That condition also can make it dangerous to drive or perform other skilled tasks and can hurt judgment and short-term memory.

Wilson points out that these ill effects are particularly dangerous in young people, whose growing brains must absorb not only academic knowledge but also social skills.

There is some evidence the drug can hamper the immune system in some patients.

And marijuana is considered a "gateway" drug - one that could lead to use of more potent and dangerous illegal drugs. The 1999 report found little evidence to support that claim on a pharmacological basis. It also observed that alcohol and tobacco are more widely used gateway drugs, particularly among younger people.

For those reasons and others, federal law classifies marijuana as a Schedule I controlled substance, the most restricted type. Such drugs are defined as having no currently accepted medical use in the U.S., a high potential for abuse, and no accepted safe approaches for use even under medical supervision.

Another Schedule I drug is LSD.

Proponents of medicinal marijuana want it reclassified at least as a Schedule II drug, the most restrictive category for addictive drugs with recognized medical uses. Examples include codeine, the active ingredient in many cough medicines, and the painkiller Dilaudid.

The U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration maintains that marijuana's risks are too great, and its medical benefits too few, to legalize it. Even in some of the 13 states that have legalized medicinal marijuana, DEA agents still arrest people on federal drug charges.

And the government can prosecute doctors who prescribe marijuana. To avoid arrest, doctors often give their patients letters stating that the patient needs marijuana, rather than a prescription.

Proponents of medicinal marijuana also argue that regulating the drug should be a state and local matter, not a federal one.

In 2005, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in a case called Gonzales v. Raich that the federal government had the right to regulate marijuana even within a single state, as opposed to in interstate commerce.

But a more recent Supreme Court decision suggests that the days of such overarching federal regulation might be numbered.

On Dec. 1, the court refused to hear an appeal from the city of Garden Grove, Calif. That city was defying a state court's order to return marijuana it had seized from a man who had won dismissal of drug charges after he provided a statement from his doctor that he needed marijuana.

Proponents hope that these incremental steps will lead to a day on which no one need fear legal punishment for using medicinal cannabis.

"I'd like us to be united in compassion," Marlowe said. "Living in fear of the government is not what we want for people who are sick and dying."

Wilson says marijuana should be legally distributed through pharmacies just as other drugs are.

"We control amphetamines - my God, we give them to kids for attention-deficit disorder," Wilson said. "Just treat (marijuana) like any other regulated pharmaceutical. I don't see any reason not to do that. I just don't see the reason."

After her tour of the state, Marlowe said she is more hopeful than ever about legal medical marijuana.

"I can smell the finish line," she said. "I'm not going to be a criminal much longer."

 

 

 

Accompanying Photos

MEDICAL MARIJUANA USE

The most comprehensive review of the possible medical benefits of marijuana is a book-length report, "Marijuana and Medicine," published in 1999 by the Institute of Medicine.

That report, co-written by a researcher at Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center, examined marijuana use with respect to five areas:

n Pain, particularly nerve pain experienced by patients with AIDS and other diseases.

  • Nausea and vomiting, often experienced by chemotherapy patients.
  • Wasting syndrome and loss of appetite, often experienced by AIDS and cancer patients.
  • Neurological symptoms, including muscle spasticity and multiple sclerosis.
  • Glaucoma, excessive pressure in the fluid inside the eye. The condition can cause blindness.

 

 

Comments

This article has been closed to new comments. Comments are generally closed after 14 days. However, comments may be closed earlier at the discretion of the News & Record.

Inappropriate content? Please notify us.

MedicalClarity

January 18, 2009 - 8:26 pm EST

A FEW RECENT TRIALS ON CANNABIS (that have reinforced what many already knew):

1. Cannabis effectively relieves HIV Sensory Neuropathy

Despite the nearly impossible obstacles in acquiring cannabis for medical research, in 2007, Dr. Donald Abrams of the University of California, San Francisco, published a study that found marijuana to be safe and effective at treating peripheral neuropathy, which causes great suffering to HIV/AIDS patients. There are no FDA-approved treatments for peripheral neuropathy, which is notoriously resistant to treatment with conventional pain medications. In the UCSF study, marijuana was clearly shown to give relief. In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, a majority of patients had a greater than 30 percent reduction in pain after smoking marijuana:

http://www.neurology.org/cgi/content/abstract/68/7/515

2. In another randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, Cannabis reduced HIV-related neuropathic pain intensity from "strong" to "mild to moderate" on average, reported Ron Ellis, M.D., Ph.D., of the University of California San Diego, and colleagues online in Neuropsychopharmacology.

http://www.medpagetoday.com/HIVAIDS/HIVAIDS/tb/10446

3. Another study in 44 patients reported in June in the Journal of Pain found that marijuana alleviated neuropathic pain arising from a variety of conditions, including spinal-cord injury and diabetes. Participants smoked marijuana on a set schedule -- first two puffs, then three puffs an hour later, then four puffs an hour after that -- from a single cigarette containing either 0%, 3.5%, or 7% THC. Average pain ratings before smoking were 55 on a 100-point scale and decreased by 46% in both treatment groups and by 27% in the placebo group one hour after the last puff.

4. As with AIDS, marijuana can relieve the nausea and vomiting caused by treatments for hepatitis C. In a study published in the September 2006 European Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, patients using marijuana were better able to complete their medication regimens, leading to a 300% improvement in treatment success.

MedicalClarity

January 18, 2009 - 10:09 pm EST

MARIJUANA'S ANTI-CANCER EFFECTS?

While much of the following is indeed theoretical or speculative, there is a strong, growing body of evidence that suggests Cannabis can possibly help to cure cancer, not cause it.

In fact, back in 1974, a study at the Medical College of Virginia found that marijuana's psychoactive component, THC, "slowed the growth of lung cancers, breast cancers and a virus-induced leukemia in laboratory mice, and prolonged their lives by as much as 36 percent." (Quote from Aug. 18, 1974, Washington Post)

Just this past January (2008), investigators at the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health found that the administration of cannabinoids halted the spread of a wide range of cancers, including brain cancer, breast cancer, lung cancer, lymphoma, pancreatic cancer, prostate cancer, and skin cancer.

Given cannabis can uniquely target malignant cells while ignoring healthy cells; and given cannabis is essentially non-toxic, cannabis offers significant advantages over standard chemotherapy treatments, according to this recent study from U. of Wisconsin.

This study reinforced the findings from other studies:

DECREASED TUMOR BURDEN IN LEUKEMIA CELLS EXPOSED TO CANNABIDIOL:
"Exposure of leukemia cells to cannabidiol led to CB2-mediated reduction in cell viability and induction in apoptosis … [and] a significant decrease in tumor burden and an increase in apoptotic tumors in vivo."
— McKallip, Robert J., et al., "Cannabidiol-Induced Apoptosis in Human Leukemia Cells: A Novel Role of Cannabidiol in the Regulation of p22phox and Nox4 Expression," Molecular Pharmacology, June 5, 2006

PROMISING ANTI-TUMOR EFFECTS OBSERVED:
"A strong and statistically significant anti-tumor effect was observed … In particular, for a highly malignant human breast carcinoma cell line … cannabidiol and a cannabidiol-rich extract counteract cell growth both in vivo and in vitro as well as tumor metastasis in vivo."
— Ligresti, Alessia, et al., "Anti-Tumor Activity of Plant Cannabinoids with Emphasis on the Effect of Cannabidiol on Human Breast Carcinoma," Journal of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics, May 25, 2006

THC AND INHIBITION OF TUMOR CELL PROLIFERATION:
"[THC] inhibited tumour-cell proliferation in vitro and decreased tumour-cell Ki67 immunostaining.”
— Guzman, M., et al., "A Pilot Clinical Study of Delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol in Patients With Recurrent Glioblastoma Multiforme," British Journal of Cancer, July 2006

POSSIBLE TUMOR GROWTH INHIBITION:
“There is recent evidence from cell culture systems and animal models that 9-tetrahydrocannabinol, the principal psychoactive ingredient in marijuana, and other cannabinoids may inhibit the growth of some tumors by modulating key signaling pathways leading to growth arrest and cell death, as well as inhibiting tumor angiogenesis…antitumoral associations have been observed for several types of malignancies including brain, prostate, thyroid, lung, and breast.”
— Tashkin, D., et al., “Marijuana Use and the Risk of Lung and Upper Aerodigestive Tract Cancers: Results of a Population-Based Case-Control Study,” Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention, October 2006

FINALLY, HERE'S A LINK TO A SUMMARY OF A LOT OF THE RESEARCH ON MARIJUANA'S ANTI-CANCER EFFECT, INCLUDING A TIME-LAPSE VIDEO SHOWING HOW THC SELECTIVELY KILLS CANCER CELLS WITHOUT AFFECTING THE NORMAL BRAIN CELLS:

http://safeaccess.ca/research/cancer.htm

jway

January 19, 2009 - 12:56 am EST

There's only one reason why marijuana's been prohibited so long, that's because the violence it generates isn't committed in this country. Everyone, and I mean *everyone* thinks marijuana's such a non-issue, kids smoke it, police make arrests, sometimes people get arrested for trafficking. It's not like the alcohol prohibition when Al Capone and his gangsters left bodies in the streets and the violence was so great that the country demanded the prohibition be ended. This time is different; no bodies in the streets this time, right?

Wrong. The ONLY difference this time is the murders are committed in Mexico and the bodies are lying in Mexican streets. The Mexican Drug Cartels murdered more than 5,700 people last year to send the government a message to leave their operations alone. That's 5,700 fathers, mothers and children murdered, beheaded and soaked in baths of acid in order to protect the Cartel's incomes from selling marijuana into the U.S. This year it's predicted an even greater number of people will be killed.

Whatever good reason there is to have the prohibition it ISN'T worth the lives of these people. License reputable businesses to legally produce and sell marijuana to adults!

Speegle

January 19, 2009 - 9:03 am EST

Jway86, I've been a fan of yours for some time now. But, your statement that cannabis should be sold just like alcohol and tobacco is much better. The comment you just posted may not hit home with most US readers. Please, do some research on how many people are killed in the USA over prohibition each year and you will find that it's close to 30,000. In just two years we lose almost as many lives as were lost during the entire Vietnam War. We both agree that cannabis prohibition has spawned a lot of evil. Far more harm is being done by prohibition itself than by people using cannabis. Glad to see you're staying active for the cause. God bless your efforts. End cannabis prohibition, do it for the children.

MedicalClarity

January 19, 2009 - 8:21 pm EST

Here's a study that was quickly shelved on Cannabis and driving from the Dept of Transportation:

"Marijuana and Actual Driving Performance" - A relatively lengthy executive summary concludes, "THC encourages greater caution." Published in November 1993 by Hindrik W. J. Robbe and James F. O'Hanlon Sponsoring Agency: U.S. Department of Transportation National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 400 Seventh Street, S.W. Washington, DC 20590.

http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/hemp/general/mjdrive.htm

MedicalClarity

January 19, 2009 - 8:35 pm EST

CANNABINOIDS: POTENTIAL ANTICANCER AGENTS

http://www.americanmarijuana.org/Guzman-Cancer.pdf

-- Manuel Guzmán, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology I, School of Biology, Complutense University, 28040 Madrid, Spain

boworl

January 20, 2009 - 3:54 pm EST

I hope that lawmakers of today are not like the lawmakers of the 1930s that listened to people like Harry Anslinger saying that black men that smoke pot rape white women. The medical community did not get a real chance to give their evidence because of the fervor over Anslinger's unsubstantiated idiotic claims. Still here we are with lawmakers sticking to their "not on my watch" stance. The fervor against pot still exists today in the face of overwhelming evidence that pot is a medicine. Many people want to change the way they feel and the only legal choice they have is the highly addictive dangerous substance alcohol. The Earth is not flat and is not the center of the universe, but the first people that said so were condemned by the Church. It was against all the ideas of the time and that is the same principal that dictates this war on pot. The lawmakers are always the last to change their way of thinking and they are long overdue to consider the real medical evidence on pot; not the Anslinger-like ideas of those against legalization. If pot should be illegal, so should alcohol, tobacco and caffeine, all of which have been found to be more dangerous than MJ. It is time for change in attitudes toward human nature and needs. If a terminally ill person takes a toke of pot and it makes them feel better, why should they be criminals? I wish somebody would explain that to me.

crashman2u

January 21, 2009 - 3:19 pm EST

I have used Cannabis for nearly 2 years to suspend horrible pain that Percocet would not. It's a shame our lawmakers are cowards and won't stand up so Tarheels can use this amazing medicine. Don't believe what the Conservatives tell you. It's NOT that bad. It's never hurt me or any of the other 261 people I know that use it.

MedicalClarity

January 21, 2009 - 5:39 pm EST

And here's a small list of a few more credible health organizations -- in addition to the American College of Physicians --that recognize Cannabis's medical value and support some form of access to Medical Cannabis (I have the position statements and/or supportive quotes from these groups, if anybody would like to know more about a specific group -- I'd love to list all their statements, but I think that would be perceived as excessive):

American Academy of Family Physicians, American Medical Student Association, American Nurses Association, American Preventive Medical Association, American Public Health Association, American Society of Addiction Medicine, Arthritis Research Campaign (United Kingdom), Australian Medical Association (New South Wales), Limited Australian National Task Force on Cannabis, Belgian Ministry of Health, British House of Lords Select Committee on Science and Technology, British House of Lords Select Committee On Science and Technology (First & Second Report), British Medical Association, Canadian AIDS Society, Canadian Special Senate Committee on Illegal Drugs, Dr. Dean Edell (surgeon and nationally syndicated radio host), French Ministry of Health, Health Canada, Kaiser Permanente, Leukemia and Lymphoma Society, Lymphoma Foundation of America, The Montel Williams MS Foundation, Multiple Sclerosis Society (Canada), The Multiple Sclerosis Society (United Kingdom), National Association for Public Health Policy, National Nurses Society on Addictions, Netherlands Ministry of Health, New South Wales (Australia), New England Journal of Medicine, AIDS Action Council, AIDS Treatment News, Parliamentary Working Party on the Use of Cannabis for Medical Purposes, Dr. Andrew Weil, Alaska Nurses Association, Being Alive: People With HIV/AIDS Action Committee (San Diego, CA), California Academy of Family Physicians, California Nurses Association, California Pharmacists, Colorado Nurses Association, Connecticut Nurses Association, Florida Governor's Red Ribbon Panel on AIDS, Florida Medical Association, Hawaii Nurses Association, Illinois Nurses Association, Life Extension Foundation, Medical Society of the State of New York, the Minnesota AIDS Council, Mississippi Nurses Association, New Jersey State Nurses Association, New Mexico Medical Society, New Mexico Nurses Association, New York County Medical Society, New York State Nurses Association, NORTH CAROLINA NURSES ASSOCIATION, Association, Rhode Island Medical Society, Rhode Island State Nurses Association, San Francisco Mayor's Summit on AIDS and HIV, San Francisco Medical Society, Vermont Medical Marijuana Study Committee, Virginia Nurses Association, Whitman-Walker Clinic (Washington, DC), Wisconsin Nurses Association, etc...

Even the student section of the American Medical Association supports access to Medical Cannabis; so it's just a matter of time, till the brainwashed, career-oriented old crust of the AMA flakes off. And with the recent double-blinds reinforcing the thousand-year history, there is a lot of pressure on the AMA to re-examine their myopic conclusions through a less-political lens.

And that's just a tiny fraction of the medical support, which is now legal in several countries and nearly a quarter (13) of the states in the U.S. If Medical Cannabis is truly a "farce" -- as the medical prohibitionists continue to ignorantly parrot --- why do all these groups support access to medical cannabis?

How long will we allow OUR government to spend millions and millions of dollars to protect and perpetuate a lie about a medicine with such incredibly low toxicity and and such a wide array of applications (known and potential)?

Finally, here’s a link to a PDF on many of the specific statements & stances of many of the associations of Nurses I listed:

http://www.ksccc.org/PDF/Nurses_Associations.pdf

crashman2u

January 22, 2009 - 7:36 pm EST

People, I can prove and Medicalclarity already has, it's not what those ridiculous commercials say it is. The garbage argument from law enforcement and the DEA that ER's and rehab centers are filled with Cannabis users is a complete lie. 99.9% of all people in drug treatment for pot, were given the option of that or jail by a conservative judge. Where would you go? There isn't 1 respectable shred of evidence to show it's the bane of our society. Why don't we go after the real problem in crack and crystal meth? That's what will destroy your kids, along with the number 1 and 2 problems being cigarettes and alcohol. It's time we use common sense and stop wasting tax payer money on this stupid war on drugs.

eMail Updates

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Featured Ads

Search

Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us

News & Record Network Sites

Triad Weather

  • Current Condition: FOG
  • Current Temperature: 43°
  • UV Idx: 0
  • Forecast High/Low: H: 0° L: 39°

User Tools

  • Social Networking
  • RSS
  • Share
  • Sign in to MyNR

Search