news-record.com

OPINION

Thomas Sowell: Health care myths

Saturday, January 10, 2009
(Updated 3:00 am)

This is an emergency book review.

Before you do anything else, make a note to read "The Top Ten Myths of American Health Care" by Sally C. Pipes. It might literally save your life by slowing the political stampede toward a government-controlled medical profession -- usually presented politically as "universal health care."

It is one of the painful signs of our times that millions of people are so easily swayed by rhetoric that they show virtually no interest at all in finding out the hard facts. Any number of other countries already have government-controlled medical professions. Yet few Americans show any interest in what actually happens to medical care in those countries.

Instead, we are being lured into a one-way process -- much like entering a Venus fly trap -- by the oldest of all confidence rackets, the promise of something for nothing.

Fortunately, Sally Pipes is one of the few who has explored the reality of government-controlled medical treatment in Canada and other countries. Among the things she discovered is that new life-saving medications that go immediately into the market in the United States take a much longer time to become available to Canadian patients -- if they ever get approved by the bureaucrats.

No doubt that lowers the cost of medications -- if you count costs solely in money terms, rather than in terms of how many people literally pay with their lives when the bureaucrats are reluctant to buy new pharmaceutical drugs.

Cancer survival rates are higher in the United States than in Europe. A recent report by the Fraser Institute in Vancouver estimates that annually tens of thousands of Canadians seek medical treatment outside of Canada, even though treatment is free inside Canada and they have to pay themselves for treatment elsewhere.

Other studies show that waiting times for surgery are months longer in Canada, Britain and Australia -- all countries with government-controlled medical care -- than in the United States.

Among the many issues explained in plain English in "The Top Ten Myths of American Health Care" are why pharmaceutical drugs cost so much, why it is misleading to talk about uninsured Americans as if they do not get medical care, and how politicians make existing insurance more expensive by blithely mandating coverage that people would not voluntarily pay for with their own money, if it was left up to them.

In various states, these mandated coverages include alcoholism, acupuncture, breast reduction and treatment for baldness, among other things. You may just want insurance to cover you in case you get hit with some big-time medical problem, but many state laws will not allow an insurance company to sell you "major medical" coverage without all the add-ons that politicians and special interests have come up with.

The net result is more expensive insurance, which in turn can mean more people being uninsured.

As with so many government programs, "the poor" are used as a political justification for imposing government-controlled medical care on everyone. But "The Top Ten Myths of American Medical Care" shows what a fraud that is. First of all, the average uninsured American has above-average income -- and people living in poverty are already eligible for Medicaid.

There are of course some serious problems with Medicaid, as there is with government medical treatment at Veterans Administration hospitals and with Medicare. But such things only highlight the dangers of having the government take over the rest of the medical sector, given its dangerous failures where it is already involved in medical matters.

The lure of something for nothing may be seductive when you are in good health. But it can become a bitter irony when you are waiting months for surgery to relieve your pain or when your life hangs in the balance while some bureaucrat decides whether you can get the best medication or something older and cheaper.

"The Top Ten Myths About American Medical Care" can literally be a lifesaver. What it reveals is unlikely to be told by the mainstream media or by other enthusiasts for the magic phrase "universal health care."

Thomas Sowell is a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution, Stanford University. His Web site is www.tsowell.com.

Comments

This article has been closed to new comments. Comments are generally closed after 14 days. However, comments may be closed earlier at the discretion of the News & Record.

Inappropriate content? Please report abuse.

Panacea

January 10, 2009 - 9:23 am EST

I will read this book: to check on Mr. Sowell's facts.

It is true that many drugs approved here take longer to get approved in Canada. However, one should also remember the FDA, for the past 8 years, has been the rubber stamp of the pharmaceutical industry. Can anyone say Vioxx?

Waiting longer for approval of some drugs is not necessarily a bad thing. Numerous research reports in JAMA, the New England Journal of Medicine, and more prove that older drugs available in generic form work just as well or better than the "latest and greatest" from the pharmaceutical industry. They do produce some wonderful new drugs. Then all the other companies rush out to produce copycat drugs for the "me too" market. When a patent is about to end, they tweak the forumula, give it a new name, and tout it as better than the soon to be generic to keep customers paying more. Example: Prilosec became Nexium. Both work equally well, Nexium is no better than its now generic and over the counter version.

Which brings me to over the counter (OTC) drugs. The drug companies also boost profits by pushing the FDA to make these drugs OTC--once the patent ends. Hence, Prilosec is now pushed as an instant cure for heart burn. It isn't. It takes several days or more to reach maximum effectiveness. Your heartburn goes away on its own.

Some work fine on the OTC market: Claritin, for example. But many parents complained that insurance would no longer cover it and had to switch to a more expensive (read new) drug.

It is true that many Canadians come to the US for elective surgery if they can afford it. Note the word ELECTIVE. Meaning, you won't die if you don't have it right now. The Canadian medical system gets people who need life saving surgery to the OR. Elective surgeries, yeah you might wait months or years. But if you are willing to pay cash, you can still get it done in Canada (or if you have private insurance).

As for the insurance claim: a twisting of the facts. The government requires insurance companies pay for more diseases than it used to, such as substance abuse. People who buy private insurance (as I did when I was in my 20's) can drop certain types of coverage--I elected not to pay for OB coverage. People in employer paid plans (most of us) are enrolled in the plan our employer picks for us. Usually that means we have no choice because the boss picks what he's willing to pay for. If you're lucky you might have a choice between 2 or three plans.

That insurance companies are now required to cover more helps people faced with catastrophic illnesses. It benefits society because these folks can be treated and hopefully return to productive lives. A person who pays thousands of dollars year after year into an insurance policy should not be told, "Sorry, we don't want to pay for that because it's too expensive--you're on your own."

I'm not arguing for or against a national health care system at this time. But Mr. Sowell is twisting his facts, and I'm calling him on it.

tooltime123

January 10, 2009 - 7:40 pm EST

I look forward to reading this book and getting the real truth about health care in America. As an insurance agent, I deal with this subject everyday and would like to point out a few concerns about Universal Healthcare.
1. Over 70% of American's like the system we currently have and think we should fix the current system instead of throwing it out
2. No one knows the true cost of universal health care. Ask you Senator how far they missed the cost estimates of Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security funding
3. Our new President neglects to tell you how many people each day who have Universal Healthcare die, just waiting to see a doctor or waiting for a medical procedure
4. America has the best health care system in the world. Bar none! Do we think the medical services and care will actually get better with Universal Health care? We are kidding ourselves.
5. Even auto insurance uses underwriting as a tool to price an auto insurance policy. If you take away underwriting from health care as Universal HC plans do: you have set yourself up for bankruptcy. Ask the French who are turning back to "private insurance plans" because their system is financially flawed.
In closing - there's no free lunch and the true cost of Universal Healthcare will bankrupt America. We simply cannot afford it. There are some in Washington who want you to believe that healthcare is a right. If so, why is it not written in the US Constitution or Bill of Rights?
I say we fix the system we have now. Make our elected officials buy the same plans we buy. Our elected officials In Washington shouldn't place a healthcare system on us when they and their families won't be using it.The best way to fix this is to have all elected officials use the same plans that we have.

eMail Updates

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Featured Ads

Search

Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us

News & Record Network Sites

User Tools

  • Social Networking
  • RSS
  • Share
  • Sign in to MyNR

Search