news-record.com

OPINION

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Thomas Sowell: Gays act like marriage is a 'right'

Thursday, November 20, 2008
(Updated 3:01 am)

Among the many new "rights" being conjured out of thin air, a new one seems to be a "right" to win.

Americans have long had the right to put their candidates and their ideas to a vote. Now there seems to be a sense that your rights have been trampled on if you don't win.

Hillary Clinton's supporters were not merely disappointed, but outraged, when she lost the Democrats' nomination to Barack Obama. Some took it as a sign that, while racial barriers had come down, the "glass ceiling" holding down women was still in place.

Apparently, if you don't win, somebody has put up a barrier or a ceiling. The more obvious explanation of the nomination outcome was that Obama ran a better campaign than Hillary. There is no reason to doubt that she would have been the nominee if the votes in the primaries had come out her way.

As the election approached, pundits warned that, if Obama lost, there would be riots in the ghetto. We will never know. But since when does any candidate have a right to win any office, much less the White House?

The worst of all the reactions from people who act as if they have a right to win have come from gay activists in the wake of voter rejection of so-called "gay marriage," which is to say, redefining what marriage has meant for centuries.

Blacks and Mormons have been the main targets of the gay activists' anger. Seventy percent of blacks voted against gay marriage in California, so racial epithets were hurled at blacks in Los Angeles -- not in black neighborhoods, by the way.

Blacks who just happened to be driving through Westwood, near UCLA, were accosted in their cars and, in addition to being denounced, were warned, "You better watch your back."

Even blacks who were carrying signs in favor of gay marriage were denounced with racial epithets.

In Michigan, an evangelical church service was invaded and disrupted by gay activists, who also set off a fire alarm, because evangelicals had dared to exercise their right to express their opinions at the polls.

In Oakland, Calif., a mob gathered outside a Mormon temple in such numbers that officials shut down a nearby freeway exit for more than three hours.

In their midst was a San Francisco supervisor who said, "The Mormon church has had to rely on our tolerance in the past, to be able to express their beliefs." He added, "This is a huge mistake for them. It looks like they've forgotten some lessons."

Apparently Mormons don't have the same rights as other Americans, at least not if they don't vote the way gay activists want them to vote.

There was another gay activist mob gathered outside a Mormon temple in Orange County, California.

In the past, gay activists have disrupted Catholic services, and their "gay pride" parades in San Francisco have crudely mocked nuns.

While demanding tolerance from others, gay activists apparently feel no need to show any themselves.

How did we get to this kind of situation?

With all the various groups who act as if they have a right to win, we got to the present situation over the years, going back to the 1960s, where the idea started gaining acceptance that people who felt aggrieved don't have to follow the rules or even the law.

"No justice, no peace!" was a slogan that found resonance.

Like so many slogans, it sounds good if you don't stop and think -- and awful if you do.

Almost by definition, everybody thinks their cause is just. Does that mean that nobody has to obey the rules? That is called anarchy.

Nobody is in favor of anarchy. But some people want everybody else to obey the rules, while they don't have to.

What they want is not decisive, however. It is what other people are willing to tolerate that determines how far any group can go.

When the majority of the people become like sheep, who will tolerate intolerance rather than make a fuss, then there is no limit to how far any group will go.

Thomas Sowell is a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution, Stanford University. His Web site is www.tsowell.com.

Comments

This article has been closed to new comments. Comments are generally closed after 14 days. However, comments may be closed earlier at the discretion of the News & Record.

Inappropriate content? Please notify us.

histrion

November 20, 2008 - 10:10 am EST

Could we just get the government out of the marriage business altogether? Leave it to religious communities to fight out the definition of "marriage". The government should be in charge of enforcing contracts, not sanctioning religious or symbolic institutions. If two folks want to establish a legal partnership, regardless of their genders, I'm not standing in their way. I'm fine with extending all the legal "benefits and privileges" of the "marriage" partnership to them, too -- I don't think it's going to destroy society to do so. But fighting over the terminology is ridiculous. Let churches decide who'll they'll "marry". The Unitarians can marry a gay couple, and conservative Baptists can refuse to recognize their marriage, and everyone can be smug and self-righteous without screaming at each other.

Rick

November 20, 2008 - 11:00 am EST

Mr. Sowell needs to get over his hatred and bigotry. It is ironic that a minority would have such little respect for the civil rights of others.

judene

November 20, 2008 - 11:49 am EST

Dear Mr. Sowell,
Great points; the "right to win", and the scary thing now, "tolerance for intolerance". What has happened to our great nation? It is truly coming to an end!

scottb

November 20, 2008 - 12:08 pm EST

As trite and predictable as this may sound, I find it hard to believe Mr. Sowell has as little sympathy as he does for the opression of any group of people. I agree with the others in their statements and feel no need to reiterate. I do want to comment on Mr. Sowell's columns in general. He is entitled to express his opinions and the News & Record can print what they want, but his are some of the driest, flatest, pieces I have ever read. Please reconsider what you print--these columns are like reading a dictionary, but not quite as informative.

samuel

November 20, 2008 - 12:27 pm EST

Mr. Sowell, I found your comments quite insightful. Thank you!

The words "hate" and "bigotry" used to describe those in favor of Prop. 8 are puzzling, since they are often employed by "No on 8" supporters in a scathing and derogatory way. If the "No on 8" campaign truly is in the right, let them react to their detractors firmly but without malice.

bheide

November 20, 2008 - 1:52 pm EST

I completely agree with Mr. Sowell. It also reminds me about how annoying it was that African-Americans were BITCHING for stupid things like interracial Marriage, voting rights, and equal pay. What gave them the right to start marching on the street, getting arrested? People VOTED those governors and senators who made those laws into power. Since when is it some black person's RIGHT to have no poll tax, or equal job consideration? They shouldn't have been such sore losers.

Had people not fought for their rights, these laws would have never been changed. In any case where you have a law like this, people are going to get blamed. These are, however, fringe cases. What makes Sowell's article an utter failure is that the very REASON he has a right to get published is because of people protesting like those now. When a law is unjust, it must be protested, and loudly. True, some people are going to be targeted. It's wrong, and shouldn't happen. But what Sowell says is completely uncalled for.

ramsr

November 20, 2008 - 4:45 pm EST

The comparison the gay community uses between discrimination of themselves and that based on race/gender etc. holds no weight. Sexual behavior is a behavior and it has consequences whether they will admit it or not.

It seems to me that the reason our government recognizes marriage in the first place it to promote it - or in other words, promotting long-term, committed, heterosexual behavior. Marriage ideally is a woman and man commiting to each other for life, in order that they may raise a family, and that children can have what they are entitled to - a mother and father that love each other. I've been working with children my whole life, and if they had as loud of voices as the gay community, they would be demanding this "right." It's simply what they need and want. So on a moral standpoint, of what's right/wrong/fair/unfair, traditional marriage can be argued to be in the best interests of children and society as a whole, and so our gov. has an interest in promoting it. I do not want to see my government promoting same-gender sexual behavior and "gay marriage" as an equal alternative, because it doesn't promote what's best for children.

DGaylor

November 21, 2008 - 4:25 am EST

Oh, for crying out loud! There is NO bigotry & hatred in this article. The bigotry & hatred being expressed is coming from the left-wing nuts that are screaming about their rights & civil liberties being trampled. No one has oppressed or trampled anyone or thing. In Ca, specifically, there are very liberal Civil Union laws...which appear to give those in said union all the rights & privileges of a traditional marriage, but the name. Is that enough? NOOOOOO...Tolerance has now been redefined as acceptance. I'm sorry, but the constitution says the majority is to protect the rights of the minority, not acquiesce to their every demand. The voters have spoken & the voters are supposed to be the true voice in this country. Get over it! Be thankful for what you have won so far. Gays have garnered more "rights" faster in this country than blacks ever have. and yet their percentage of the population is far less. I think you have achieved tolerance, now back off from the majority that does not desire to have the agenda of acceptance rammed down their throats.

Thank you for your clear, concise commentary, Mr. Sowell!

soLDS

November 22, 2008 - 1:53 am EST

I appreciate that an African-American is standing up for the voting rights of his ethnic group as well as other religious groups and is not joining the "fear bandwagon" of future minority exclusions by a majority. Here is an educated man who deserves respect. This country should not tolerate hate crimes but they are letting some homosexuals get away with it. I say some because there are those in the GLT community who do not agree with the "Bash Back" techniques. I have more respect now for the African-American and Hispanic communities because they voted by there own conscience befiefs and most refuse to be bullied otherwise. It was good to see people of different religious beliefs or no religious beliefs join together for a common cause. If my vote is overturned then we will peacefully join together to oust those who disenfranchised our vote.

soLDS

November 22, 2008 - 1:57 am EST

And, yes, I should have reviewed my spelling before i submitted my opinion. I hope it wasn't too much of a distraction.

James1977

November 25, 2008 - 10:48 am EST

I think Mr. Sowell is correct in his assessment: Various groups act like it is their right to win and when they don’t win they will cry foul, long and loud until someone will –with the intention of shutting them up, placate them by giving them what they want.

I think that the Gay Rights group got this idea from watching spoiled 3-year-old children.

The 3-year old will scream and cry when something doesn’t go the way they want it to go and they will carry on as long as someone is paying attention to them. If no one is paying attention, the 3-year old will find something else to do, like watch TV or take a nap. I think that as long as the Gay Community knows that someone, i.e. the media, is focused in on their temper tantrum, they will keep pointing at the mean Mormon and African American Kids and screaming that they aren’t playing fair.

eMail Updates

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Featured Ads

Search

Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us

News & Record Network Sites

Triad Weather

  • Current Condition: FAIR
  • Current Temperature: 43°
  • UV Idx: 1
  • Forecast High/Low: H: 62° L: 43°

User Tools

  • Social Networking
  • RSS
  • Share
  • Sign in to MyNR

Search