news-record.com

NEWS

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

The Editor's Log

A conversation about the newspaper, online and journalism in general.

September 23, 2009

10 things I hate about you

Reading this list of 10 things that TV news viewers hate about TV news made me laugh out loud because it so reflects my own feelings.

8. Your efforts to beat the competition with weather coverage. “They accepted actual weather emergencies as a coverage necessity, but questioned the hyping of weather coverage when things just aren’t that bad. Worse than that, they say, are delays in giving the forecast just to make them watch a whole lot of junk they don’t want to see anyway.”
 
5. Your endless use of teases: "Most of the panelists abhor teases that draw them through the newscast to a less than satisfying payoff.  They ask instead for more meat and less sizzle when if comes to partitioning the news hole."
 
1. Your lack of respect for the people you cover: "Time and time again throughout the entire panel discussion, the viewers found examples of what they considered news people going too far covering the story. Airing the 911 call of the woman who just shot her husband went too far, showing the young boy crying at the state of poverty in which he lives cut too close, and moving the camera in close to the man weeping after witnessing a tragic fall pushed too much.  The panelists implored the journalists present to treat their sources—especially victims of crimes or disasters—the way they would want their own family members treated."
 
Then, I realized that our readers likely say similar things about us, although I doubt they complain about how much time we spend on grooming (#9) or our breathless focus on Hollywood and the rest of the world (#6).
 
I do have to say that #10 -- Your seemingly endless obsession with pets -- is one that I disagree with. By every available piece of data I've seen -- with the exception of this list -- people love reading about animals. Just look at this, which was posted late in the day yesterday but still was the second most viewed story of the day.
 
The others, especially numbers 1, 2 and 3, provide advice we need to hear.
 
 
 

September 20, 2009

Judging news judgment

Want evidence that people think differently? Check out this list of readers’ all-time favorite books.

That wasn’t enough for me, and you can help me write next week's column.
 
Knowing that “edit a newspaper” is one of the three things that every man thinks he can do better than anyone else, I asked our Reader Advisory Network about news judgment.
 
On the front page last Sunday, we published a story by Jeri Rowe about a child with a terrible disease and his indomitable spirit. The same day, on page A2 we published a story about the anti-big government protest in Washington. One local and unique to our pages; the other national and all over television and the Internet the day before. One a feature; the other hard news.
 
I asked the members of the advisory network if the protest story should have been on the front page instead of the story about Stevo.
 
204 people responded and the final tally might surprise you. But first, some of the responses:
 
In favor of the protest on the front page:
 
* The protest in Washington was extremely important. The majority of citizens want a democracy and want to take back their country. For the past 9 months, our rights are being jeopardized and unless something is done we'll lose them.
 
* Though the story on the young man was interesting and inspirational, it is more of a "life" feature than "front page" news.
 
* I'd rather see news than features on the front page. The old tugging at the heartstrings story doesn'at appeal to me very much.
 
* I prefer national or international news on the front page always
 
* Of course, it needed to be on the front page. Your liberal bias is showing.
 
* I do enjoy human interest stories and medical information stories a lot, but right now, big brother is getting way too big and is a matter of great concern to most people
 
* It is the taxpayers march and to say that only thousands were there was a understatement and you downplayed the event with that heading, very deceiving.
 
* When it's an issue involving the Democrats it's front page news. If it involves Republicans it hardly gets any coverage. Look at the poll taken of people's views regarding the media. It tells the truth.
 
In favor of the Stephen Ludwig feature on the front page:
 
* We need to be able to have something other than political news on the front page from time to time.
 
* The protest is getting enough coverage on FOX.
 
* Getting more local news stories is more important to me. Yes, national and international news is still important but I am worn out about hearing about healthcare reform..
 
* I love to see positive human interest stories on the cover every once in a while to remind us all that it's not all about negative issues
 
* There really weren't enough people there to make it statistically relevant. You just encourage a bunch of people to keep on with something they are being stirred up about without any reason
 
* I really liked the front page as it was. I guess I am getting a little tired of so much news on government and politics and this front page was refreshing.
 
* I prefer local information on the front page. The big govt protest story didn't deserve front page if Sen. Kennedy's death didn't either.
 
 * The govt in DC article was where it should have been. The article about the little boy transcends govt/class/politics and speaks to the human spirit.
 
The result?

A virtual tie: 88 said the Stephen Ludwig story belonged on the front page, and 85 said the protest belonged there. The others said they had no opinion or answered a different question. (My favorite: "it really did not not matter..I can just as easily turn a page...")

I'm going to write next week's column on this topic. Help me figure out what it means and how to use it to improve ourselves.

ACORN coverage, III

My newspaper column

Previous posts here and here.

The liberal activist group ACORN is caught up in yet another scandal, and some people are trying to drag the news media down with it.

ACORN is a community-based group that advocates for the poor and operates in 100 cities across the country. Earlier this month, some of ACORN’s workers in Baltimore, Washington and Brooklyn were caught on a hidden camera coaching a woman posing as a prostitute and a man posing as her pimp how to evade taxes and misrepresent themselves to get into a home.
 
The videos were posted on the Internet, and when FoxNews aired them last week, the uproar began. With good reason, too. They depict shameful behavior.
 
Other national networks and newspapers were slow to pick up the story. In retrospect, so were we.
 
And we certainly heard about it.
 
The first wave of calls and e-mails came on Tuesday. Most of the callers were irate but polite. They wanted to know why we hadn’t published a word about “a scandal that probably reaches all the way to the White House,” as one man told me. (It hasn’t so far.)
 
We were protecting the group, they said, because we are liberals.
 
Our politics had nothing to do with it, but I’ll talk more about that in a moment.
 
On Wednesday, we published a short story out of Washington on page A7 about the growing scandal.
 
The second wave of calls and e-mails came that day, with readers saying they wanted more information and that the story belonged on the front page. “This is fraud and involves billions of dollars of tax money,” another man told me. “You need to investigate it and stop hiding it.”
 
On Thursday, we published a longer story on page A8 about the mounting scandal.
 
We don’t have reporters in Washington, but ACORN’s Web site lists offices in Raleigh, Charlotte and Durham. Reporter Mark Binker began looking for the North Carolina angle.
 
Mark found the state director of ACORN who told him that the group is not involved in the sorts of problems that have plagued the organization elsewhere. Instead, he said, it is working on landlord-tenant disputes, preventing foreclosures, and lobbying to raise the minimum wage.
 
But in 2008, ACORN was involved in the national get-out-the-vote campaign. It claimed to register 28,000 voters in North Carolina, but about 120 forms the group submitted from Durham caught the attention of the State Board of Elections, and there apparently is an ongoing investigation.
 
Still, Guilford County’s elections director reported no problems with the group.
 
On Friday, we published a front page blurb about our ACORN coverage, sending readers to Mark’s story and another wire story on page A8.
 
Why haven’t we published the story on the front page? Again, it wasn’t political.
 
Our primary objective is to cover local news. The vast majority of you get your national news from other sources. Consequently, on weekdays, local and state news lead the front section, followed by national and world stories. Most days, our national section begins on page A7 or A8.
 
The only local angle to this story, so far, is that there is no connection to the problems facing the national organization. Publishing that story prominently would have been akin to putting a story about a storm in Dallas on the front page, even though there are sunny skies in Greensboro.
 
On the other hand, had Mark found some suspicious activity or wrongdoing, we would have published it on the top of the front page.
 
And we would do that for liberal and conservative organizations alike.
 
In a side note, more than 30 people contacted me about my last column explaining why we withheld the location of the neo-Nazi meeting. Thank you for taking the time. I welcome your feedback on this column, too.
 

September 19, 2009

Vote here

The litter that are campaign signs distracted me as I drove past the Old County Courthouse front lawn. There must be at least 50 25 of them vying for the attention of the voter, which pretty much means that you don't see any individual one.

I wondered if anyone actually made a decision based on one of those signs. For the sake of the Republic, I hope not.

That aside, early voting has started. Find information about the candidates and the issues at Vote '09.

September 18, 2009

Why do you read it?

In the depths of the comments in this post about our ACORN coverage, a commenter named Interested leaves this question:

There are a number of posters who regularly complain about your (N-R) liberal bent. Why do they continue to read your paper, why not find one more to their liking? If I don't like the meals served in a particular establishment, I take my business elsewhere.

People read a newspaper for many different reasons. Getting angry at it is one.

But I'll let y'all weigh in.

ACORN coverage, II

Mark Binker made some checks about the local ACORN operation.

Not much there so far, although the commenters aren't convinced.

For the record, we published this story on page A8, with a front page promo. Given that the story quoted several people -- government officials and ACORN -- saying no investigation and no reported dubious behavior were happening in N.C., that seemed the appropriate place.

Thoughts?

 Update: Mark has further thoughts.

September 16, 2009

ACORN coverage

Whenever ACORN does anything remotely sketchy -- and that's apparently not hard for the liberal organizing group -- we get calls not only to publish chapter and verse of the allegations, but to publish them on the front page.

Here's is an excerpt from one of the tamer e-mails:

A young couple has done the job major journalists used to do in uncovering corruption and fraud in our country. There is plenty of coverage of Rep. Joe Wilson because of his statement to President Obama. This should be covered but why has the News-Record not given the ACORN sting any coverage?

Normally, they are accompanied by claims that we're covering up for the group because it is liberal and that's what we do.

Well, not so much.

It's not that the latest ACORN scandal isn't a fascinating story, particularly if you're interested in national politics with an anti-Democratic bent. But we've changed. We're emphasizing local news and information. The videos in question record incidents in Baltimore, D.C. and New York with little, if any, relationship to the Triad. We published a short story this morning on page 8 about a call to investigate the group.  Page 8 was our first national news page. And in the scheme of all the news in the nation and world that has an impact on us in Greensboro, this doesn't rise very high.

For better or worse, we aren't the only ones treating it this way, either.

6:20 p.m. update: Given the continuing developments on the story, we will have fuller coverage tomorrow.

Thursday update: The editor of the Austin paper writes about ACORN coverage, too. His reasoning is similar to mine, except for his comments about Fox News. What Fox reports doesn't have anything to do with our news judgment. It is true that most of the calls I've gotten have come from people who have seen the story on Glenn Beck. But a good story is a good story, regardless of who is pressing it. It just needs to be more local than it is right now.

We're looking for the local ACORN angle now.

September 14, 2009

Joining the club

I admit that ever since April when we combined our two news sections and pushed local to the front of the first section, I've been watching the other big papers in North Carolina closer than usual. Would any of them follow our lead? More specifically, would any of them kick national and world stories inside and go all local? (Coincidentally, the latest Pew survey on the news media said today that people rely on their newspapers for local news, not national news.)

I also admit that I was disappointed that none did. It was getting lonely out here.

Until today.

Our neighbor to the west, the Winston-Salem Journal, debuted its redesigned paper today. Three sections, with local taking up the first several pages in the front section. No standalone "local" section. The Journal's executive editor explained in a column last week. The managing editor wrote about it today.

Our experience is that newspaper readers didn't mind the changes, and some applauded them. We got only a smattering of negative comments, primarily from couples who both wanted the news section in the morning. On our end, it saved us money and allowed us to focus on a robust local report.

I wish the Journal luck.

September 12, 2009

Marching to a different drummer

The mass media is going to have to pay attention when you’ve got a million people, or whatever it turns out to be, marching. You can’t say that didn’t happen.

That's Guilford County's Marcus Kindley talking about this weekend's march on Washington to protest too much government.

Does any conscious person not know that there are some people out there angry with the way things are going?

Does the fact that we interviewed Kindley and published a story about the march before it even happened make his point moot? 

Could the organizers spend their energy more efficiently than creating strawmen to knock over? 

10:45 a.m. update: Guess it worked. The march is the lead story here.

6:10 p.m. update: Tens of thousands of people protested, not millions. That's according to Foxnews.com. Just in case someone says we're underreporting the millions of people there. I wonder if, even though there were many less than a million, anyone will say "that didn't happen." 

Sunday update: I got this e-mail this morning.

I am writing to thank the News-Record for reporting on the Tea Party's march to the U.S. Capitol. I had decided to discontinue getting the News-Record because it was so one sided. Instead of reporting the news equally and letting the public decided (novel idea) what it believes in, the News-Record decides to express only their views/opinions.


The News-Record did a nice job reporting on A-2 (wow) about Thousands Speak out against Obama's Plan. And it was given most of the second page, not just a small paragraph, good work. This is encouraging. Hopefully, the paper will continue to report the news and not just one side but both sides and OBJECTIVELY. I really don't want to know what you think or your opinions, just want the facts and let me decide for myself what is right.

Monday update: First call today from a man who the story on A2 Sunday should have been on the front page, "out of fairness."

September 10, 2009

Frank Batten Sr. RIP

A great newspaper is distinguished by the balance, fairness and authority of its reporting and editing. Such a newspaper searches as hard for strengths and accomplishment as for weakness and failure. Rather than demoralize its community, the great newspaper will, by honest and intelligent journalism, inspire people to do better.

Frank Batten Sr., who served as chairman of Landmark Communications for 31 years, wrote that. He died this morning.

He created and built Landmark Communications into a billion-dollar company that owned newspapers, television stations and the Weather Channel. But his first love, I believe, was newspapers. He bought the Greensboro Daily News and the Greensboro Record in 1964.

I met him in the mid-80s when I was a young editor and immediately liked him. He talked about the importance of first-rate journalism and put ethical conduct at the top of his priority list. It was clear that the first order of business was to do the right thing. He wasn't just talking the talk like a corporate suit; he had lived the life, knew what he was talking about and truly believed in principled journalism and business.  He -- and the standards he established here -- is the reason that I and so many others have made Landmark a destination stop.

He's been out of the business flow for several years as his health faltered. But his legacy, in my mind, is a company that values high ethical conduct, strong community journalism and decency. He will be missed.

About the Author

Top Tags

eMail Updates

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Featured Ads

Search

Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us

News & Record Network Sites

Triad Weather

  • Current Condition: PARTLY CLOUDY
  • Current Temperature: 53°
  • UV Idx: 2
  • Forecast High/Low: H: 56° L: 46°

User Tools

  • Social Networking
  • RSS
  • Share
  • Sign in to MyNR

Search