Reading the newspaper coverage of the Greensboro sit-ins and their aftermath is fascinating. Even though I lived through it, I'm learning a lot about that period in Greensboro and the South.
This week, we are reprinting articles from our archives that put the sit-ins in some context. One striking thing is the use of the term "Negro." It was an acceptable reference in 1960 so that when the paper used it in a headline, as it did on Feb. 4, 1960, I suspect no one blinked an eye. Or, even in 1980, when we quoted a white waitress as telling the sit-in participants back in 1960, "Negroes eat on the other end." That usage is a part of history.
In the article we reprinted today, originally published Feb. 1, 1970, the writer himself routinely uses the term Negro as an adjective. One instance:
There was a good deal of talk meanwhile. But Negro leaders and young apprentices beginning to spearhead civil rights movements had to re-learn what they described as an old lesson: Nobody was going to give them anything; if a door was to be opened it would have to be forced open.
My memory is that the term Negro had been replaced by black in common usage by 1970. Its use in this article jarred me every time I came across it. But it was apparently acceptable, according to the AP Stylebook, which is our usage guide. I don't have a 1970 edition, but the 1986 AP Stylebook says this: Use black or Negro, as appropriate in the context, for both men and women.
No longer. The current AP Stylebook says: Use Negro only in names of organizations or in quotations.
Times change. Want to read more from the archives? Try these.
Not all of the newspaper's content appears online.
*There is a fee for downloading some older articles.