One of my New Year's resolutions is to try out and grasp some new technologies. More specifically, find devices and processes that will improve what I do and know.
That desire is what started me on Twitter a few years ago, and the experience has been well worth it. The timesuck of Web surfing has drastically decreased. The serendipity of discovering interesting sites and ideas and opinions has dramatically increased. And befriending people near and far has been an unexpected blessing.
I know there are a lot of people who are online much of the day and don't understand the value of Twitter and/or look down on it. (Brian Williams recently said he didn't need to know that someone had just bought an awesome pair of sweat pants. Where he came up with that doesn't surprise me -- there are lots of trivial tweets -- but why he put any stock in it bewilders me.)
But David Carr of the New York Times shares his experience on Twitter, which is the same I've had:
What could anyone possibly find useful in this cacophony of short-burst communication?
Well, that depends on whom you ask, but more importantly whom you follow. On Twitter, anyone may follow anyone, but there is very little expectation of reciprocity. By carefully curating the people you follow, Twitter becomes an always-on data stream from really bright people in their respective fields, whose tweets are often full of links to incredibly vital, timely information.
The most frequent objection to Twitter is a predictable one: “I don’t need to know someone is eating a donut right now.” But if that someone is a serious user of Twitter, she or he might actually be eating the curmudgeon’s lunch, racing ahead with a clear, up-to-the-second picture of an increasingly connected, busy world. The service has obvious utility for a journalist, but no matter what business you are in, imagine knowing what the thought leaders in your industry were reading and considering. And beyond following specific individuals, Twitter hash tags allow you to go deep into interests and obsession: #rollerderby, #physics, #puppets and #Avatar, to name just a few of many thousands.
If you aren't on Twitter, give Carr's column a read. It explains the service's value and knocks down most of the criticism.
Incidentally, I read this article because Mathew Ingram, communities editor of the Globe and Mail, recommended it on Twitter.
Update: Thanks to digiphile, these are the twitter links to Carr and Williams. (Oops. Sorry. Wrong Brian Williams. NBC's isn't on Twitter, apparently.)
Update II: Just for illustration, this morning in about 1 minute, I was directed to interesting pieces on 10 things every journalist should know in 2010; 7 New Year's resolutions news execs should be making; whether there is a fear shortage; and questions about the Apple Tablet.
Not all of the newspaper's content appears online.
*There is a fee for downloading some older articles.