news-record.com

BLOGS

The Editor's Log

Publish or perish

I am now up to 25 e-mails and phone calls thanking me for not publishing the neo-Nazi information.

NOT publishing. I can't remember such a response FOR publishing something.

It got me thinking about all the things that people think would be better if we didn't publish. One commenter suggested that we omit addresses of people arrested. Another wrote me: Now if you would only not disclose Charles Davenport, I'd be happier as I am an adult. He is merely a rabble-rouser and lives to incite. Another suggested eliminating Leonard Pitts.

But it isn't just the desire not to read political views that differ from yours. I routinely hear from people who don't want us to publish "bad news." Or more specifically, news that reflects poorly on Greensboro. Or High Point. Or Eden. Or Asheboro. Some don't want us to publish news about the latest celebrity inanity. Others wish we wouldn't publish news about two-bit crimes. Some support the idea that we shouldn't publish information about companies considering locating here, even if they are asking for taxpayer incentives.

They almost all cite the overall public good for keeping the information out of the newspaper, but the reasoning is dubious, in my opinion.

As a reader, I think in terms of getting all the information I can. It always amazes me when people say they don't want to know things. I know this will confuse some people, given that part of my job is to decide what is not published. I'm not trying to justify that or criticize those who want to read only what they want to read.

With so much information available -- what we publish in the paper every day is just a fraction -- it just interests me that so many people want even less.

 

Other Recent Entries

Comments

This article has been closed to new comments. Comments are generally closed after 14 days. However, comments may be closed earlier at the discretion of the News & Record.

Inappropriate content? Please report abuse.

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

gsostudent

September 9, 2009 - 10:31 am EDT

You really should get rid of Charles Davenport. I'm posting this here because comments are disabled on his article. In his latest article, he tries to argue that the NSM is from trailer parks, which is clearly a class based insult which is not only incorrect, but it obscures the problem by trying to blame poor white people for racism.
He's also a huge fan of blaming men of color for not being father figures without recognizing that there is a score of reasons (such as racial profiling and our government's preference of prisons over rehabilitation) for this besides his racist assertions.

I'm well aware that he isn't being published in the news section, but if you're publishing such a reactionary rightist (which you shouldn't be allowing space for racism and classism in your pages, especially on a regular basis) then you should allow for more radical writers to be published in the N&R as well.

gsostudent

September 9, 2009 - 10:32 am EDT

By the way, do you really not have anything else to talk about on your blog than this issue? I'd hope as the editor of a daily newspaper you'd have a little more to say on other issues too. Change the topic already.

John Robinson

September 9, 2009 - 10:44 am EDT

It is always curious to me when people are so intent on snuffing out other views. And when they tell other people what they should be writing about.

dcribar

September 9, 2009 - 1:38 pm EDT

Speaking of snuffing out other views, why aren't your readers allowed to comment on Davenport's column?

John Robinson

September 9, 2009 - 1:44 pm EDT

Readers are encouraged to write letters to the editor about that column. I suspect the editorial folks have gotten some.

Oh, you mean, in online comments? I will defer to Allen Johnson, who is Davenport's "boss." However, I will say that it isn't uncommon for us not to enable comments on content where we expect comments that violate our terms of use.

stafford5465

September 9, 2009 - 4:53 pm EDT

The N&R does need people to tell them what to write. If they cannot pay for employees to write, they could include outstanding material from the New York Times or the Washington Post. I know you have only so much money for newsprint. However, you could reduce the size of pictures and replace them with adult content. You get more readers by putting any more hard news and analysis and less puff stuff. The Board of Education writer may report items that were addressed at a meeting, days after the meeting. Some of the news writers need to take lessons from the sports writers. We want a writer to keep their feet to the fire. Problems should come out in the paper long before the Board of Education issues a Press Release. For instance the lack of progress fixing the Oak Ride air quality problem is only reported when GCS has something to say.

wstutts

September 9, 2009 - 5:25 pm EDT

I thank you for withholding info on the neo-nazi's, I wish you would do the same with Nelson Johnson and the Pulpit Forum. I hold all three in the same mold.

John Robinson

September 9, 2009 - 5:45 pm EDT

Thanks, Wayne. You would be surprised at the number of news conferences and press releases from the Pulpit Forum that we don't cover. I even got a release in which they were praying for me because of what we don't publish.

eMail Updates

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Featured Ads

Search

Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us

News & Record Network Sites

User Tools

  • Social Networking
  • RSS
  • Share
  • Sign in to MyNR

Search