news-record.com

BLOGS

Thinking Out Loud

Clotheslined

They call it clotheslining in football, when someone uses a rigid, outstretched arm to tackle an opponent by striking him in the neck or chest.

It is dirty and illegal.

And it hurts like hell.

Just ask Pricey Harrison, who received such a blow, figuratively speaking, when attempting to push an innocent piece of legislation in favor of clotheslines..

Far be it from me to tell our neighbors how to dry their tidy whities, but Harrison’s bill should have gotten a more serious hearing.

In short (definitely no pun intended), the Greensboro Democrat’s legislation would have empowered residents to choose whether they want to use clotheslines instead of dryers.

Some people consider that more important a question that some people's obvious discomfort with visions of their BVD's fluttering in the summer breeze.

In fact, there is a national movement to return to clotheslines as a smarter, greener alternative to dryers.

After all, dryers consume huge amounts of power.

Appliances account for about 17 percent of the average household's energy consumption, with refrigerators, clothes washers, and dryers leading the way.

They also are a fire hazard. The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission estimates that 15,500 fires associated with clothes dryers occur annually, causing an average of 10 deaths, 310 injuries and more than $99 million in property damage

For my mother, though, it's simply a matter of quality.

As she sees it,  using sun and wind to dry laundry makes it fresher and involves less wear and tear on the fabric.

She has never owned a dryer in her life -- and I'm betting she never will.

And if it rains, then it rains. She either races to gather the laundry before the storm arrives, or she washes it again after the storm has passed.

Nor do clotheslines have to be eyesores. New, more compact designs can keep them largely hidden from view.

All that said, I should come clean (honestly, no pun intended), I live in a community whose covenants prevent clothelines.

And I never enjoyed having to hang clothes on the line while growing up, especially women's clothes.

And on rainy or cold days the laundry just doesn't get done.

Still, the bill never had a chance, except as an easy punch line for punchy legislators.

“Yeah, they did behave childishly,” Harrison said. “They never did consider the bill on its merits. It was frustrating.”

Plus, if many of the lawmakers who poked fun at Harrison’s bill were honest, most remember well a day when clotheslines were more the rule than the exception.

According to the N.C. Center for Public Policy Research, one-third of the state’s lawmakers are 65 or older. Yup. They remember.

But some people much younger than that appreciate the simple wisdom of a string of wire and two poles.

They ought to have the right to choose.

That's the thrust of a movement, right2dry, which is trying to persuade the Obamas, "during a one-day photo op,"  to hang laundry at the White House to encourage other Americans to follow suit..

The right2dry Web site boldy declares, as a banjo plays in the background: "It is the inalienable right of every, man, woman and child to line dry."

 

 

 

 

Comments

This article has been closed to new comments. Comments are generally closed after 14 days. However, comments may be closed earlier at the discretion of the News & Record.

Inappropriate content? Please report abuse.

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

brian444

July 21, 2009 - 3:45 am EDT

This is a tough call. On the one hand, I have a hard time supporting any legislation coming from these eco-hippies and their dogged opposition to electricity, internal combustion engines, and normal light bulbs. On the other, I can't see that government should really be interested in regulating appropriate clothes-drying techniques (or anything else). So I'm forced to support the legislation.

Andrew Brod

July 21, 2009 - 9:25 am EDT

Why is this a tough call? If you start opposing ideas because of who proposes them, then you're no better than some of the other frequent commenters on the N&R site, for whom partisan and identity politics is everything. And brian444, we both know you're better than that. If an idea's a good idea, then it's a good idea, period. Even if it comes from "eco-hippies."

And this is a good idea. The only argument ever leveled against outdoor clothes drying is aesthetics, which includes the facts-challenged mythology of property values. Weighing in on the other side are individual choice, the desire to save money, and (dare I say it?) some sound environmental considerations. To me, it's not even close. So okay, let communities continue to ban clotheslines on front lawns, roof tops, etc. Aesthetics aren't nothing. But it's very hard to justify local bans on ALL clotheslines.

Allen Johnson

July 21, 2009 - 3:20 pm EDT

You make a good point, Andy. There is plenty of reasonable middle ground between mandating no clotheslines at all and setting fairminded rules governing types and locations of clotheslines.

brian444

July 22, 2009 - 2:25 am EDT

Well, Andrew, we should definitely think twice about encouraging these people. First, you're throwing an aluminum can in a different bin and the next thing you know, your house is lit like a biology lab (if you haven't had the foresight or attic space to stockpile a lifetime's supply of the quality incandescent bulbs). Today, you buy a car with a higher mileage standard, tomorrow you're forced to haul rickshaws if you make a six-figure income. Now, they encourage you to buy locally, but next week, they're banning lemons because they're grown more than a day's walk from your house. Or they're confiscating the assets of those enemies-of-the-planet who use electricity in an effort to lower, by some infinitesimal fraction of a degree, the planet's AC setting. There's no telling where it will stop.

It's a very slippery slope, as with Mussolini and the top-notch train scheduling or Hitler and the nice highway system. You support their "good ideas" and the next thing you know, they're hauling everybody away to concentration camps. As a general rule, then, it's probably safer just to adopt a zero-tolerance policy with these people and oppose them on principle.

On the other hand, the history of Soviet-era art argues strongly against governmental control of aesthetics.

eMail Updates

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Featured Ads

Search

Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us

News & Record Network Sites

User Tools

  • Social Networking
  • RSS
  • Share
  • Sign in to MyNR

Search