news-record.com

BLOGS

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

The Chalkboard

Advanced learners in Guilford County

I’m preparing an article on the Advanced Learners program in Guilford County Schools and wanted to know your thoughts. If you’re a parent, please feel free to e-mail or call me.

E-mail: brian.ewing@news-record.com
Phone: 373-7351
 

Comments

This article has been closed to new comments. Comments are generally closed after 14 days. However, comments may be closed earlier at the discretion of the News & Record.

Inappropriate content? Please notify us.

stafford5465

October 12, 2009 - 12:47 pm EDT

The complaints of AP students and parents are unjustified. A smart child that is not getting enough in the classroom should be smart enough to teach themselves. In Guilford County, we discourage children from going to the most competitive colleges. We also discourage children from being Doctors, Lawyers, etc. that require a challenging education path. If you want children to succeed at the highest levels, they must have high goals. I have had teachers and other school personnel tell my children that they should not go to an expensive school like Duke, Wake Forest and Davidson. I have had employees tell my children that certain colleges are "a long way away" and implied they should not go far away from their families to get a great education. When my son announced he was going North to a great school. Some congratulated him, others reminded him how cold it was. The implication was clear, you should not go North no matter how great the opportunity. We have public school in Guilford County. If you want special treatment for your child, I suggest you send them to private school. Even there, I think you will be disappointed. A bright kid need to teach him/her self and be thankful for their gifts.

JackK

October 13, 2009 - 10:53 am EDT

"A smart child that is not getting enough in the classroom should be smart enough to teach themselves." This statement is incredibly silly . . . no child, whether in public school or private, should have "to teach themselves" nor should innate ability remove the school's responsibility to provide appropriate instruction. Even strong students benefit from strong, appropriate instruction. Each student should get what they need and deserve, and while I've heard Mr. Stafford opine that smart students will do "just fine" on the tests, he seems to forget that the tests are MINIMAL STANDARDS TESTS, on which a high score is nothing to brag about. Why ignore our brightest and best academics. . . do we do that with our best athletes or musicians? It's not about getting more than other children, it's about getting what is reasonable and appropriate given the starting place.

angie123

October 12, 2009 - 7:28 pm EDT

Joe,

I am offended by your comments. My daughter happens to be one of these "gifted" kids - 99th percentile repeatedly on EOC exams. She also happens to be one of the few who doesn't attend Lincoln (won't get into the reasons here). We can't afford private school, so your "suggestion" means nothing to our family, unless, of course, you'd like to sponsor her.

With the exception of math, there are no challenging classes for these kids (who elect not to go to Lincoln). In Language Arts, the strong AL kids write 10 page research papers and the other kids write 6 page research papers. The rubrics are harder for the AL kids too.

In Science and Social Studies, the students are broken into groups of 4 - each having an AL student as "lead". It's the role of these students to mentor and help teach the others in their group.

Provide the proof when you say kids are discouraged from being doctors, lawyers, and going to school up north. I don't believe it for one second.

Mialamasoul

October 13, 2009 - 8:05 am EDT

I don't think it is that they are being discouraged. I think it is more like parents have to root around to find out about this program, or their children have to be "invited" in by the school. It is not a program about which information is easily and readily available. For example, there is no "find out about our AL program and how your child can be a part of it" literature that comes home with the reams of info that comes from the PTA, and fundraisers, and school realease, and discipline policies.

JackK

October 13, 2009 - 10:43 am EDT

Look at the Forsyth County Schools website and see how easy it is to find information on their programs for gifted or AL students . . . then try to do the same on the GCS site. GCS is better, but for years AL information was almost hidden, and not particularly clear.

bjoyful

October 17, 2009 - 4:54 pm EDT

Children are not "invited" in by the school. Children are screened, usually from aptitude and achievement tests given by the school system, and testing permission is sought for those children needing further testing. Minority and culturally disadvantaged children can be retested under the current AL policy. There is no more reason to send home AL information en masse to parents than there would be to send home information en masse for other special needs programs.

stafford5465

October 13, 2009 - 9:24 am EDT

The school system discourages children from being all they can be. The most powerful force in achievement is the child's desire to learn. Children should be taught to teach themselves to learn. Harvard takes 20 students a year from North Carolina. How many does Guilford Co. send? Less than one per year. About 12-14 per year come from the Raleigh or Charlotte area. Duke Univ., last year had a needs based scholarship for a student in Guilford Co. No takers. There was not one student in Guilford Co that wanted to go to Duke that needed financia help. Don't wear you kid out in the early grades. The hardest part of education is College and Graduate School. When they get they we want them to be fresh and ready to learn. Let the young kids play. Take them to the library. Don't depend on the public schools to meet all of their needs. I agree, there is no need to send your kids to Lincoln.

GCS Parent

October 14, 2009 - 9:42 am EDT

Joe, You just contradicted your own point. Who's going to "teach them" to teach themselves? Do you want your surgeon to teach himself? How about your lawyer? Structural Engineer? Pharmacist? Will you be happy knowing that no one who is at least as smart as they are taught them anything? Your points are valid, but only for some kids. The ability to self-teach is based largely on maturity, not IQ. Where is the desire to go to Duke or Harvard going to come from if advanced learning is not a priority in the early years, especially middle school?

And complaints about AP classes being bloated with kids who don't belng there is VERY MUCH valid. If every kid who gets a 3 on an EOC is put in AP it becomes an average class, not advanced.

jwg_

October 14, 2009 - 9:03 am EDT

Joe,

I disagree with you. Smart kids need challenges, resources and more than just a place to 'teach themselves".
--------------------------
IMHO, AL in GCS has always been a balancing act between providing needed resources for AL kids and politics with politics usually winning out.

Our experience has been that the AL program started off at an excellent level for elementary students (at least in the VSN program) and then declined from there.

jwg

mom4thearts

October 14, 2009 - 10:16 am EDT

My fourth-grader started The Academy at Lincoln VSN program this year. I am amazed by his progress thus far. I will venture to say he's learned more in this first grading period at Lincoln than he learned in 6 months at his old school, including his AL classes. He is however struggling with the high standards. For too long the standards for him have been too low and have bred complacency and a bit of laziness. I fear those can be the outcomes when bright students are left to flounder on their own. Any AL teachers out there agree?

Although I am very grateful for The Academy at Lincoln, I do wish my child could be challenged just as well at his neighborhood school. There are enough Lincoln elementary children from our area to make a whole VSN class at our neighborhood elementary school. I really feel for those children who travel all the way from High Point. By the time they get home, all they have time for is homework and supper then off to bed.

JackK

October 14, 2009 - 10:27 am EDT

My son also struggled at first in the 4th grade VSN program at Lincoln, but once he got used to the more demanding, more structured approach he had no difficulty. The long ride did take something out of him, I agree, but he really did get intellectually stretched so it was worth it. Keep encouraging your child to stick with it and don't be afraid to talk to teachers who sometimes load it on rather than going for depth of understanding. For my son it was an excellent program . . . of a type which should be available in more places.

mom4thearts

October 14, 2009 - 10:41 am EDT

Thanks for the encouraging words JackK. I truly needed to hear/read them!

stafford5465

October 14, 2009 - 1:07 pm EDT

I admit I have not been clear and have been wandering all over the place. Children should be challenged to whatever level they can do the work. This does not have to be done in pull-out classes or magnet schools. When I say "AL should teach themselves" I do not mean there is not a place for the teacher. What I do mean is that learning for AL should be reading based. Quiet classrooms with children reading and writing is the preference to teachers "performing" all the time in front of the class.

momfirst

October 14, 2009 - 1:39 pm EDT

I do not think that the two-three hours that AL kids get in neighborhood schools is sufficient; however, how fair is it to ask a 9 year old to leave their friends so they might be challenged academically? It is so sad that there is ONE opportunity for really rigorous learning for Guilford County. I have found the transportation situation at Lincoln to be a nightmare. Who would have ever dreamed that a high school and a middle school would be served by one one-way street? I wonder if it were in a different neighborhood if it would be tolerated? I also think it is important to remember that the kids at Lincoln are CHILDREN. There is a big difference in a challenge academically and abuse. Especially given the fact that many kids are riding the bus for long distances, two-three hours of homework may not be reasonable. Just because the kids are bright is no reason to allow them to grow up without sports, friends, and extracurricular activities (and I do not include Math Club, Robotics, etc.!)

JackK

October 14, 2009 - 2:16 pm EDT

I suspect that when the two buildings were built they served a local population of whom 90% or more walked to school. I'm sure the planners never envisioned so many busses or cars disgorging students. Many of our older schools have had to be retrofitted for computer wiring, too, and the hallways resemble the inside of submarines with all the conduit. But why would architects in the 1950s or 60s have known that computers would be the thing. Besides the long ride, the worst thing to me about the VSN program at Lincoln was that my little fellow had to ride with older, probably more street-wise students whose normal language would peel paint. The busing experience forced him to see and hear things no 4th or 5th grader should. The most tiresome thing about the AL program, especially under Grier was how hard parents had to fight, how ugly we all had to be for our children to get what they needed. And periodically we heard that our kids were just prima donnas, that they had a master/slave relationship with the districted children at Lincoln and that all of us white parents were just a bunch of whiny racists. But that's GCS.

jwg_

October 14, 2009 - 2:45 pm EDT

momfirst - It's also a dead end one way street :}

Joe - IMHO, you're still off in left field if you think that it's adequate to give a kid a book, sit her in the corner & expect her to teach herself (although that is what happens to a lot of AL kids now, I suspect). A good teacher is not just a performer, especially a good AL teacher.

stafford5465

October 14, 2009 - 3:28 pm EDT

I agree that some students are not self-strarters. However, there are others that are bored by the slow pace of instruction. What I want to do is not load a kid down with homework, but to stimulate his interests. At about 7 years old, my son got excited about chess. He read many books and played a lot. He no longer has interests in chess but exploring it at one point of his life was great for his development. The AL kids that want to read and explore new areas of interest should be provided the time to do so. Is this crazy or not?

GCS Parent

October 14, 2009 - 3:40 pm EDT

Brian - as for your article... I would like to address the lack of differentiation available in the neighborhood middle school. My 8th grader attended the VSN prgram from 3-6 grade. For non-accademic reasons we moved him to his neighborhood school for 7th grade (after assurances he would still get high level instruction for his 4 core classes). For 7th grade that was basically true due to the team approach used. Now in 8th grade the site based decision was made to only cluster AL kids for math and LA. He is getting some differentiation in SS (because of that teacher) and none at all in science. He is bored out of his mind! I wish we had left him at Lincoln, and so does he. Everything said here about transportation, friends, etc. is true. Attending Lincoln comes at a great sacrifice. But, we have learned that it's an even greater sacrifice to attend the neighborhood school and get no challenge at all for 85% of the day (in spite of an AL Plan that requires more). This is no way to prepare a high IQ child for high school or college. Unfortunately, Lincoln is it. If you want your VSN child challenged they must go there to get it. They must endure a long bus rides and lack of afterschool activities, or parents must comit to spending a lot of time driving them back and forth to avoid that. But, in my opinion, the cost of not going is far greater in the long run. So Joe, you are wrong! In today's GCS classrooms, the only way for high apptitude students to get RELIABLE instruction close to what they need they must go to Lincoln. Otherwise every class is a gamble based solely in the non-mandated skills of the teacher to try and push them farther than the administration requires. Sad, but true.

momfirst

October 14, 2009 - 4:56 pm EDT

But....listen to what we are saying, it is so sad. That we are willing for almost "geek" kids to sacrifice their social lives, their sports, their time because our school is unwilling to look at alternatives. Who is paying the price? Our best and our brightest. I agree that VSN kids will be bored out of their minds at regular community schools - most of us parents brought our children to Lincoln for this very reason. But, our children are paying a price to be stretched academically. Because there are few alternatives, most parents at Lincoln put up with the conditions knowing they have no choice. How stressful a situation is that?! Someone from GCS should go and observe for several days at Lincoln. Experience the traffic, the car riders who exit and walk up to the building in the rain, the rambunctious, scary, primarily local middle schoolers, the silent lunches and recesses, the pressures for parents to spend money for all sorts of things - including books used in the classroom, the disorganization that is rampant, the PTA which barely functions, it goes on and on.....How many people would say that the atmosphere at Lincoln is better than their former school? Again, I ask....at what price academic excellence? And....why can't we do better?!

mom4thearts

October 14, 2009 - 5:38 pm EDT

You get a standing ovation from me Momfirst! True, someone from the GCS AL Department should go and observe Lincoln for several days.

Brian Ewing

October 19, 2009 - 1:51 pm EDT

GCS Parent,

Thanks so much for the info. Would you mind calling me to be a source in my story?

373-7351

GSO_mom

October 14, 2009 - 5:05 pm EDT

Brian: I think it's important for everyone to realize that there is a difference between smart kids and gifted kids. Gifted kids process information and learn differently (hence the need for the differentiation) than average students. Many times we confuse this concept. Many smart kids can be successful in the traditional classroom. Teachers trained and certified in gifted education learn various ways that gifted kids learn and should be presenting concepts using those techniques. Additionally the curriculum for gifted students is designed to be more experiential, and given the pace of the class because gifted students typically grasp concepts quickly, classtime can be spent providing a more in-depth and broader approach to a given topic.
Additionally, any child, gifted or not, should be allowed, and ENCOURAGED, to reach his/her full potential. It's clear by the test results of the top percentile of students in GCS that this is NOT currently happening. Test scores for gifted students are not rising at the same rate of other students, and this does a huge disservice to these bright students in the same way it is a disservice to any student who is not allowed to reach his/her full learning potential. Students are students and should not be required to teach themselves or have their parents teach them. Public schools are for ALL students, gifted included. Nor should their days be spent reading books for 6 hours a day which is what my eldest child did when she was in a traditional classroom setting. Yes, she loved, and still loves, to read, but that is not all that school should be for this children. Not all gifted children learn best by reading -- in fact, most MUST have hands-on/experiential learning in order to understand and grasp new concepts.
Another important issue, that is rarely discussed with gifted education is that gifted students can have learning disabilities which sounds oxymoronic, but is a very real issue. Certified teachers should learn how to handle these students as well and this should be incorporated into the curriculum.

stafford5465

October 14, 2009 - 5:11 pm EDT

Having an AL magnet has unintended consequences. Children below the 6th grade should go to school in the local community. I push reading because it can be adopted at every school without much extra effort. It can also fill in the gaps that many kids experience. Only a portion of our teachers have the ability to inspire our students to the greatest heights. Should all of these teachers be used for AL students or should they be used for the students that are below grade level. If we cannot do both, what should we do?

bjoyful

October 14, 2009 - 7:30 pm EDT

There needs to be an honest look at how the Advanced Learner Dept. in Guilford County (GC) got into this quagmire of services for gifted students so that GC can move away from the current situation and use the rewriting of the AL Plan to bring credibility back to gifted education. The underlying problem lies not in the services to students as much as it does in the identification of students. Nationally, you would expect approximately 3-5% of students to be identified as gifted. If you look at the figures Guilford County so proudly hails, you will find that percentage much higher. The inflated numbers came about when the program was changed from Academically Gifted to Advanced Learners and the criteria was changed to increase the diversity of the program. The intent is a good thing, but the reality of putting a gifted label on so many children is misleading. The truly gifted (that 3-5% of the population) were naturally caught up in the identification process, as well as a large number of students who are high achievers. As teachers, due to testing pressures, began to put more and more emphasis on bringing up the scores of the low achieving students, the challenge to gifted and high achieving students in the regular classroom unfairly shifted to the Advanced Learner Program. When critics look at how “gifted” students are doing in Guilford County, they need to adjust their numbers to look at the students who fall into that top 5% of the population. Way too many students have been identified that should not have been identified, but who deserve to have their needs met in a rigorous and challenging manner in the regular classroom.

My two cents worth: Guilford County has a program that serves the needs of our truly gifted population of students – the Academy at Lincoln. Perhaps the requirement for attending Lincoln needs to be looked at so that it reflects the top 5% of the GC student population. That would necessitate expanding that program - as it should and would be money well spent. In middle school and high school, for the many deserving students who are not at Lincoln, there should be rigorous and challenging classes modeled after the IB program that is inclusive of all children and not exclusive to a chosen population. At the elementary level, there could be AG specialists who work closely with the regular classroom teachers in delivering high-quality and challenging lessons that are inclusive, flexible, and fluid.

The very good news is that there is no one anywhere better able to lead Guilford County through this quagmire than Lee Ann Segalla. She has the background, experience, creativity, vision and foresight to lead the school system into a new day in identifying gifted students as well as appropriate service delivery in the regular classroom so that all students are on an upward spiral.

JackK

October 15, 2009 - 8:58 am EDT

I agree with your assessments and suggestions. I would only add two: have GCS work diligently to identify highly intelligent students in pre-school and kindergarten and work with them, especially those from less academic backgrounds, so they can rightfully be placed in more rigorous classroom settings. GCS should also help teachers get their AL certification as they once did and encourage teachers to avail themselves of that opportunity.

GCS Parent

October 15, 2009 - 10:14 am EDT

I agree with all of you, especially the comments about Lee Ann Segalla. She is outstanding!! Terry Grier did a GREAT DEAL of damage to the AL program during his time here. He was assisted by Deana Hayes. Unfortunately, one of them is still around. I have a much brighter outlook on the future with Lee Ann working for Mo Green. I just hope he will keep Deana and her politics out of the way so that actual progress for ALL children can take place. I also hope that we can get to a point where the parents of gifted students are not always "on watch" to have to fight GCS to maintain the services that we do have because we know that the best interests of our children's education is not what matters, it's only diversity and nothing else. IQ knows no color. Until the identification and administration of AL services gets there we will have problems and the gap at the top will not change.

Lincoln is by no means a perfect situation. But, it is MUCH BETTER than what came before it. One limitation that everyone has to realize is that the program has to be located in a school that actually has space. Most GCS schools are overcrowded (Lincoln is getting there). So while it would be great to have multiple sites to serve the VSN population, there just isn't space in the schools. Having a VSN class at each school would be even more of a challenge. You would need 1 maybe 2 teachers in each school skilled to teach all 4 core subjects at that level. Some schools may only have a few VSN students in the whole school. With less than half of all GCS AL teachers certified to teach AL as it is that would be a real challenge! The peer group of students is one of Lincoln's greatest strengths. It's the first time (and maybe only time) in a lot of these kids’ lives that they will get to be in class with kids "just like them". It actually lowers the "geek" level quite a bit. It's going back to the neighborhood school where the geek problem comes back with a vengeance.

mom4thearts

October 15, 2009 - 3:03 pm EDT

I am very thankful for the Lincoln VSN program even with its flaws. Although I do see the challenges in providing VSN services in neighborhood shools, why shouldn't we at least strive for that ideal situation especially for elementary children? The middle school schedule and travel-times have been tough on my fourth-grader. He has very little time for extra-curricular activities or to play with his "regular" elementary friends who are on a different schedule. Concerns about "geekifying" our children are valid ones. My son has a friend at Lincoln who lives in High Point and has a 2-hour bus ride home with middle-schoolers whom he says act "inappropriately." I think we can and should do much better for that child and others like him!

Why can't Lincoln Elementary VSN students follow an elementary schedule?

GCS Parent

October 15, 2009 - 3:20 pm EDT

VSN 4/5 cannot follow a elementary schedule because of transportation.

mom4thearts

October 15, 2009 - 4:35 pm EDT

I think GCS could work out a better transportation plan for these kids if they wanted to, even with an elementary schedule. Maybe no one has tried to force the issue.

GCS Parent

October 16, 2009 - 10:14 am EDT

How? They altered the school start time to 9am to accomodate getting the kids there from all over creation as it is. If they had to get elementary there for a 7:50 start time they would be picking them up over an hour earlier than they already are. Plus there would have to be buses dedicated just to pick up and deliver 5 classes of elementary students at Lincoln. How would you justify the expense of that, not to mention the strain on the staff at Lincoln (a 7:00 - 4:00 school day) and the added traffic? As it is we have busses running with a fraction of the seats full to transport magnet students. And how would we look to those who think the VSN program is nothing but a bunch of elite kids who's parents want special treatment?

I am not disagreeing with your concersns. I share them. But trust me, after all we went through during the "program re-location fight" a middle school schedule was a welcome compromise to maintain the program.

eMail Updates

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Featured Ads

Search

Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us

News & Record Network Sites

Triad Weather

  • Current Condition: FAIR
  • Current Temperature: 46°
  • UV Idx: 2
  • Forecast High/Low: H: 57° L: 46°

User Tools

  • Social Networking
  • RSS
  • Share
  • Sign in to MyNR

Search