Among the benefits for North Carolina promised by the U.S. Senate's health-care reform bill, state Reps. Alma Adams, Pricey Harrison and Verla Insko wrote in our Ideas section Sunday, is "an end to the insurance industry's discriminatory practice of higher premiums for women."
I wonder why they don't fix that themselves.
This refers to the fact that, in the individual health insurance market, younger women pay higher premiums than younger men.
(The situation is usually reversed for older individuals, but that doesn't seem to bother anyone.
This practice is allowed, and in fact justified, by the N.C. Department of Insurance. But its policies could be changed if directed by the state legislature. As veteran legislators, Adams, Harrison and Insko could be at the forefront of such an effort.
But the issue isn't so simple. As a Department of Insurance spokeswoman explained to me after U.S. Sen. Kay Hagan (a former North Carolina state legislator) raised the complaint of discrimination several weeks ago, the reason for the disparity in premiums is because younger women are more expensive to cover.
In part, this is driven by state law, which mandates certain coverage in all individual health-insurance policies. More of these mandates apply to women than to men, such as minimum hospital stays following childbirth, mammograms and pap smears, bone-density tests, minimum hospital stays following mastectomy and reconstructive breast surgery, and contraceptives. You can read more about this in this DOI information beginning on page 11.
Based on that information, it hardly seems "discriminatory" to charge higher premiums, but Adams, Harrison and Insko should make the case in the state legislature if they truly believe this is a policy that needs to be changed.
The question then will become: Who pays if the insurance companies can't charge more to cover mandated higher costs for women?
I guess that would have to be men.
Not all of the newspaper's content appears online.
*There is a fee for downloading some older articles.