A writer whose letter we'll publish tomorrow praises U.S. Rep. Brad Miller for his "courage" in voting for the House health-care reform bill.
I don't begrudge Miller's vote, but I can't see any way it required courage.
The bill was backed by House Democratic leaders. Miller's part of that leadership. His district is solidly Democratic. In fact, he's the only representative that district has ever had.
Nothing could be safer politically than for him to side with his party on major legislation.
It took exactly the same amount of courage for Republicans like Howard Coble and Virginia Foxx to vote no. Their districts are strongly Republican, and their opposition probably keeps them in line with a majority of their constituents.
For examples of fortitude -- or at least calculated risk-taking -- within North Carolina's congressional delegation, you have to look at the three Democrats who voted against the bill: Mike McIntyre, Larry Kissell and Health Shuler.
Kissell and Shuler ousted Republicans to win their seats (in 2008 and 2006, respectively), and neither one is safe from GOP challenges in the future. They have to keep looking over their right shoulders if they want to stay in office.
McIntyre seems firmly ensconced in his eastern district and likely won't suffer any dent in popularity from his no vote, so his courage level is probably a good bit lower.
Kissell's vote struck me as gutsiest because it crossed some of his most passionate supporters -- liberals who really hated Republican Robin Hayes, whom Kissell defeated in their second go-'round, and placed a lot of faith in Kissell as a progressive champion. You can get a sense of their anger here at Bluenc.
Meanwhile, Republicans in Shuler's western district are dogging him to pledge to vote against Nancy Pelosi's re-election as speaker. Get a grip, GOPers. That vote isn't until January 2011. Hassling a Blue Dog Dem like Shuler just after he voted against his party on major legislation is just not very gracious.
Not all of the newspaper's content appears online.
*There is a fee for downloading some older articles.