news-record.com

BLOGS

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Off the Record

Something new from Kay Hagan

Has this been done before by a North Carolina senator?

Kay Hagan today released the names of individuals she has recommended to the president for appointment to federal positions in the state.

I find this remarkable.

First, Hagan assembled a screening panel of very credible individuals, including former N.C. Chief Justice Burley Mitchell and Greensboro attorney Jim Phillips, a former chairman of the UNC Board of Governors. Although this committee served an advisory function, it helps assure that Hagan was presented with capable candidates and lessens the chance that she would show unreasonable personal or political favoritism. I say "unreasonable" because I would not expect any politician to totally avoid personal judgments or political considerations.

Second, she is recommending three people for each position available. The president will nominate one. Of course, he can nominate someone else entirely, but doing so would be personally disrespectful to the senator and also trample over the "advice and consent" responsibility of the Senate. And if he did, Hagan could use some arcane parliamentary provision to hold up confirmation, so it will work better for everyone if he goes with one of her suggestions for each post.

Third, she is making a public announcement of all this instead of quietly passing the names to the White House. She believes the public is entitled to know who is under consideration even before the president nominates someone. Bravo. And good for the candidates, too, for their willingness to be publicly identified when two-thirds of them won't get the job in the end. Contrast this to the secrecy of our public universities and city and county governments, which simply can't identify their final candidates for top jobs because doing so would discourage applicants. Come on!

The headlines in Greensboro are the people recommended for the posts of federal judge and U.S. attorney in the Middle District.

Two names for the judicial position are no surprise: Catherine Eagles, who is Guilford County's senior resident superior court judge; and Edwin Wilson, the senior resident superior court judge in Rockingham County. Both are well qualified. If Eagles gets the appointment, she will become the second Guilford County judge to vacate a seat this summer, after Henry Frye Jr. Gov. Perdue would name a replacement.

The third candidate is Anita Earls, executive director for the Southern Coalition for Social Justice in Durham. As a social-justice activist and civil-rights attorney, she might appeal to President Obama, but I think the people of central North Carolina might rather have a federal judge with a proven record on the bench dealing effectively with law-and-order issues.

One of the three hopefuls for the Greensboro-based U.S. attorney's post is very interesting: Ripley Rand, son of Hagan's former N.C. Senate colleague, the very powerful Tony Rand. The younger Rand is a special superior court judge in Wake County, appointed by former Gov. Easley. He was considered a possible choice as U.S. attorney in the Eastern District, but Bush appointee George Holding apparently is staying on there (with Hagan's support) to continue investigations into the Easleys and John Edwards. So Rand has been shifted our way. It definitely looks like politics at work, although I've also heard that Rand is very capable. Well, politics doesn't hurt when it comes to government appointments, but if he gets the job he'll have to deliver.

The other two are unknown to me (which doesn't mean much). An R. Lee Farmer has a law office in Yanceyville, and an R. Lee Farmer has a law office at Bald Head Island. Same person? Yanceyville's in the right neighborhood, anyway.

Susan Taylor is a resident superior court judge in Union and Anson counties.

No disrespect to Farmer and Taylor, but this looks like a gimme for Rand.

Nevertheless, the point is that we know much more about what's going on with these appointments than ever before in my memory. I appreciate that, and I also look forward to seeing who will be put forward for a North Carolina seat on the Fourth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals in Richmond. Jim Wynn's name keeps coming up, and he would be an excellent choice.

 

 

Comments

This article has been closed to new comments. Comments are generally closed after 14 days. However, comments may be closed earlier at the discretion of the News & Record.

Inappropriate content? Please notify us.

Dogwood

July 10, 2009 - 3:44 pm EDT

Doug Thanks for your court following. Today a 4th Circuit Appeals Court judge was reported as retired due to no fault of her own. She herself saw illness early at 57 years old. She (S.C.) and Duncan (N.C.) were the firsrt two women ever to gain appointment to the 4th Circuit of Appeals. Our 4th Circuit is still lame due to massive vacancies. I pray the courts be filled with honest men and women, not politicians.

Doug

July 10, 2009 - 4:41 pm EDT

Thanks for the tip, Dogwood.

Here's a link to a story about Karen J. Williams' abrupt resignation yesterday:

http://www.greenvilleonline.com/article/20090709/NEWS01/90709004/1004/NE...

The lead:

"The first female chief judge of the U.S. 4th Circuit Court of Appeals stepped down from her post today -- citing an early diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease ..."

Sad.

Her name has already been removed from the list of judges at the court's Web site (http://www.ca4.uscourts.gov/), which contains no information whatsoever about her resignation. Not so much as a fare-thee-well

Here's something from the LegalTimes blog:

http://legaltimes.typepad.com/blt/2009/07/4th-circuit-chief-judge-karen-...

There are now five vacancies on the 15-judge court ... a huge opportunity for President Obama to share the future of this important circuit.

North Carolina should get two of those seats. Sen. Hagan has expressed her desire to see that happen.

In the meantime, best wishes to Judge Williams. She showed great integrity in stepping down before she loses any of her judgment. I hope the onset of this terrible disease is very slow.

Doug Johnson

July 11, 2009 - 5:32 am EDT

I much rather read about move on,org, group at Hagan's office in Greensboro Thursday.
Like Michelle Malkin said, you are not going to read this in your paper.
Wonder if Hagan going to take this same health program she pushing down our throats?
Seems like a good question for some reporter!

Doug

July 11, 2009 - 10:35 am EDT

So you're a member of moveon.org? You're full of surprises.

tonymo

July 11, 2009 - 12:34 pm EDT

Mr. Clark, if you don't have a sensible answer to a sensible question don't say anything. I don't think one has to belong to Move On to know what they stand for. Despite your fawning piece on our newest liberal senator, she did vote for the "emergecny stimulus" which is turning out to be, as many said it would a disaster and has little to do with creating jobs. If it did, there would have been more than ONE percent for small business which creates approximatelt SEVENTY percent of all new jobs, and considerabley less going to states to help pay their Medicaid costs, which creates NO new jobs! This "emergency" stimulus was not even designed to spend most of the money until 2010-11. Perhaps I don't understand the meaning of the words, emergecny or stimulus, or at least the administration, and those (99% Demo-Rats) don't understand what those words mean! and the on going ramblings about a new "stimulus" plan is nothing more than an admission that the first one, as many said, is not working, as nearly TWO million more jobs have disappeared since the payoff to the left was signed into law.

It's not surprisong that you you are also unaware of the little provision put into the Admiral Kennedy, Hero of the battle of Chappaquiddick, health plan that EXEMPTS members of congress. I'm sure Move On didn't mention that little tidbit, nor did anyone from the "msinstream" media! It's corruption like this that is the reason these bills are remmed trhough with little or no debate, or noe time to read the bills. See Cap, Tax, and Control, and the "emergency stimulus."

Doug

July 11, 2009 - 1:14 pm EDT

We're having the stimulus debate on another post, as you know.

There will be opportunities to discuss health care.

The news yesterday about Kay Hagan was her recommendations for federal appointments. If you and Doug Johnson have opinions about that, please have at it. It seems to me that if you can't find fault with a Democrat for the subject at hand, you'll shift to some other subject where you do have criticisms.

I certainly have not agreed with everything Sen. Hagan has done, nor will I in the future, but I will give her credit when I think she's doing something positive. This is one example.

Connie Mack Jr

July 11, 2009 - 3:00 pm EDT

So Rand has been shifted our way. It definitely looks like politics at work, although I've also heard that Rand is very capable.* Doug

Boy! Are you getting bad info about Tony Kid. The younger Rand is a known joke among most lawyers who have had cases before him in the past and his total lack of knowledge about simple law.....The kid has a 95% rejected appeal rate from the Appeals Court on his cases.........

Dogwood

July 11, 2009 - 5:01 pm EDT

The Rand family are insiders to me as I watch from afar. Both seem to be the chosen ones and no one knows what they are up to. Maybe some with a need of a favor with a big bank account know. I am sure Rand Jr. works hard, loves this state etc. Good Grief just cause daddy can get in line first to appoint his own son is not good enough without full disclosure of judgment temperment and quality of scholarship. The public needs truth not nepotism. I know a bunch of good men and women that have had excellent parentage and I do not short a fellow nor would I deny anyone a duty due to a last name. It is just tough these days to figure out NC's future.

Dogwood

July 11, 2009 - 2:59 pm EDT

I am torn between Catherine Eagles and Edwin Wilson. Both have intigrity, honesty and have worked for justice with mercy. I cannot help but feel fear if either one of these scholars leaves their current post and a less qualified appointee comes up the pike. No Fosters please. Judges are the third branch of government. Richard Burr are you on board? It takes the US Senate to confirm Federal judgeships and I vote for both to be appointed, except I can't vote. I just pray for a replacement equal to or exceeding their merits.

Connie Mack Jr

July 12, 2009 - 4:25 pm EDT

Judges are the third branch of government.* Dogwood

No they are not! The Judical branch is simply to protect the rights of individuals, life, liberty and property from the State as the Constitution requires. However, that process disappear years ago.........

Dogwood

July 12, 2009 - 6:02 pm EDT

Executive Legislative Judicial were the three I was writing about.
The implied 4th, freedom of the press, freedom of speech etc are not guaranteed in todays world.
Tomorrow watch the confirmation hearings conducted by the US Senate Judiciary Committee. Their newest member appointed Friday is an ex-comedian. I have questions for the soon to be Supreme Court Justice appointee: Do lawyers get paid by the hour in private practice? Sotomayor's ruling that a lady that could not finish her three day Bar exam successfully after 3 tries,sued for more time and gained permission via S's Appeal Court to linger and finish at her jolly well own time (five days). How fair is that the to the client that hires this passee? How about double billing for start...time is time, basic law office management billing. Don't get me started on the Section 7 Equal Opportunity decision she made. Thankfully it was overturrned. (Now the propaganda is Ricco was lawsuit happy...pleease. I want my doctors to be certified not fools that do not study and game the system. I don't want an oopes, this will take five days to fix a hernia..... cause.....

jonjones

July 13, 2009 - 2:45 pm EDT

Connie, Where do you come up with a 95% reversal rate for Judge Rand?

I looked at the 20 cases of his that the N.C. appellate courts have issued published opinions on and that come up when you search the courts' web site. (available at nccourts.org.) I found one reversal. So I'm really curious how you come to that figure.

Doug

July 13, 2009 - 3:05 pm EDT

Thanks for the info, JJ. I should have checked on that myself, but I rarely take seriously anything Connie says.

Andrew Clark

July 13, 2009 - 8:30 am EDT

Putting aside all the misleading things you said about the stimulus (yes, paying medicaid costs will keep jobs, but even without that, how could you possibly say kicking the poorest of the poor out of the healthcare system is good for the economy?), you do realize that Hagan has been relentlessly attacked by moveon.org, right? She was meeting with them to try to limit the damage because she's been attacked very strongly from the left for her stance on health care.

Doug

July 13, 2009 - 3:08 pm EDT

It's a political benefit for Hagan to have moveon.org give her a hard time. It makes her appear to be more of a moderate.

eMail Updates

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Featured Ads

Search

Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us

News & Record Network Sites

Triad Weather

  • Current Condition: LIGHT RAIN
  • Current Temperature: 36°
  • UV Idx: 0
  • Forecast High/Low: H: 37° L: 24°

User Tools

  • Social Networking
  • RSS
  • Share
  • Sign in to MyNR

Search