news-record.com

BLOGS

Capital Beat

Fracking

Back in January, I wrote about hydraulic fracturing and the potential for this method of natural gas drilling in North Carolina. At the time, lawmakers sounded cautious about the potential.

For those who haven’t followed the issue: the fracking debate has to do with the potential to extract energy and profit balanced against some pretty severe environmental consequences, some but not all of them related to water contamination.

For those who have followed the issue, this notice is on the House calendar today:

There will be a meeting after session on Tuesday, April 12, 2011, in Room 544 LOB on Natural Gas “Fracking” 101. The process of “fracturing” or “fracking” to develop natural gas reserves is attracting considerable interest among energy companies, states and environmental organizations, including those in North Carolina. In this presentation, Dr. Vik Rao, Executive Director of the Research Triangle Energy Consortium housed at RTI in the Research Triangle Park and former Chief Technical Officer at Halliburton, provides an overview of the fracturing process — how it works and its economic and environmental challenges. Dr. Rao will be joined by former Secretary of the NC Department of Natural Resources Secretary Bill Holman - now at the Duke University Institute for the Environment — who will provide an overview of how other states are managing the policy questions concerning fracturing.

“After session” isn’t exactly a time-certain for this meeting. The honorables are set to meet at 2 p.m. in the historic state capitol building. Figure the fracking meeting will start sometime between 3:30 p.m. and 4:30 p.m. if nothing goes awry. You can tune into audio here (click on "Finance Committee Room").

House Speaker Thom Tillis and Senate President Pro Tempore were asked about fracking this morning.

Tillis: “I don’t have a lot of technical knowledge on the bill. What I will tell you is that I think one of the ways we provide a better economic base for North Carolina in the future is one — try and figure out how we can potentially, responsibly extract energy from the ground and use it. It grows jobs; it provides us with more energy independence.

“The question of whether we could pass a bill over what is now literally now the next 45, 50 days of the session — I don’t know. But I do think it’s something we will study and focus on and potentially in this term take a decision on it.”

Berger: “One of the things we think can potentially be done to really jump start a whole new sector in North Carolina’s economy is to do some things in the field of energy. There are a number of options out there. Fracking is one of them; off-shore exploration is another. I think you’ll see us looking at a full menu of options to try to create a new jobs sector in North Carolina.”

Comments

This article has been closed to new comments. Comments are generally closed after 14 days. However, comments may be closed earlier at the discretion of the News & Record.

Inappropriate content? Please report abuse.

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

jeffreyhsykes

April 12, 2011 - 12:26 pm EDT

I am completely opposed to lifting the ban on hydraulic fracturing in North Carolina. We are to be good stewards of Creation and the evidence on record to date clearly proves that hydraulic fracturing is injurious to the land and that the industry has a track record of zero concern for the impact on not only natural resources but the health and well being of residents who live near their drilling operations.

This is a terrible idea, lifting the ban on hydraulic fracturing, and is not worth 10,000 jobs, since they would all be temporary anyway.

Our elected officials should continue to work toward creating a better atmosphere for businesses that will provide sustainable, long-term jobs for our citizens. Any jobs that come with the hydraulic fracturing process will be temporary at best. The process does have the potential to do permanent damage to the land we value so much in North Carolina and to the health and well being of any number of its citizens.

Doug Johnson

April 13, 2011 - 5:29 am EDT

From what I have read, it's so safe even Obama is for it.
It also brings in jobs, and state using it gets a ton of revenue.
Seems the biggest critics of it, are those Sierra Folks, who collected a ton of money on save the whales, and spend it to help the whale Al Gore election bid.

jeffreyhsykes

April 14, 2011 - 3:41 pm EDT

Yours may be one of the most misinformed comments I've ever read on the web. Hydraulic fracturing is anything but safe and has caused massive pollution in Pennsylvania and wrecked the rural water supply for numerous citizens.

The jobs that come with this drilling method are temporary and will only benefit drilling interests from out of state.

Those interests do not get the right to pollute the permanent water supply in North Carolina for temporary financial gain.

Here is an informative website that chronicles what the experience has been in Pennsylvania:

http://www.frackalert.org/

eMail Updates

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Featured Ads

Search

Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us

News & Record Network Sites

User Tools

  • Mobile
  • Social
  • RSS
  • Share
  • Sign in to MyNR

Search