"If you read a lot of book reviews, there are certain words that tend to crop up with comforting, or maybe it’s dismaying, regularity. Lyrical. Compelling. Moving. Intriguing. Absorbing. Frustrating. Uneven. Disappointing. But there is one word you seldom encounter: boring. It occurred a mere 19 times in the Book Review in 2009, and rarely as a direct description of the book under review."
I would say that the reason I've never written a book review with "boring" as a descriptor is because I rarely finish books that bore me. There are so many books in the world; why would I continute to read something that isn't good? Here, in no particular order, are books that I found too boring to finish reading despite their bestseller or classic status. (In fact, I find that most books I find boring are ones I feel I should read.)
1. The Life of Pi: I gave this one maybe two chapters. But I had no patience for it. All I remember is it's about a tiger and a guy and a boat. I really didn't care much past that.
2. Moby Dick: I had to read this one in school, and I still didn't finish it. (And I ALWAYS completed my work. I was that kid.) But really, a whole chapter about squeezing whale sperm? If I ever find the sonnet I wrote about Moby Dick in high school, I will post it here. Because, really, I wrote a sonnet rather than read that book.
3. The English Patient: I got halfway with this one. I really wanted to like it and finish it. But I think the only thing more boring than this book was the movie made off of it.
4. The Pillars of the Earth: I've never gotten very far in this, but all I know is that every time I put the audiobook on in the car, I find myself wanting to nod off while driving.
So, readers, what books out there have you found too boring for words?
Not all of the newspaper's content appears online.
*There is a fee for downloading some older articles.