news-record.com

BLOGS

Green Notes

GTCC to build green demonstration home

Can a "green" home ever be affordable for a moderate income family? Guilford Technical Community College seeks to answer that question as faculty and students construct a demonstration home that will eventually go on the market in a mid-priced neighborhood.

GTCC students build a home every year as part of their learning experience, but this time the college wants to focus on sustainable construction and renewable energy training as part of the N.C. community college system's "Code Green" initiative.

The college received a $164,576 grant from Duke Energy to help design and outfit a certificate program in solar photovoltaic installation and repair, and to help pay for the design, construction and landscaping of the home. The grant funds will be used to develop the curriculum; train faculty in the construction technologies, architectural technologies, HVAC and plumbing departments; purchase training and equipment; advertise for public tours of the green home; and pay for the cost of seminars and speakers to educate the public about renewable energy.

Today, six faculty members met to review the blueprints of an 1,800-square-foot, three bedroom house that will be built on a corner lot in a subdivision near Walmart off South Elm-Eugene Street. A 2,400 square foot house is currently listed in the neighborhood for $139,000 so that gives you an idea of the price range GTCC has to deal with. In contrast, most of the new green homes in this area that I hear about cost at least $200,000-$300,000.

"We're trying to price it so it fits into the neighborhood but it still provides an opportunity for our students to do a PV installation and solar thermal and do as much sustainable construction as we can afford," said Shanna Chastain, who oversees industrial construction and engineering courses at the college.

The faculty intend to pursue some type of green building certification for the house, preferably LEED. The house will include passive and active solar elements, as well as full insulation, eco-friendly materials,  rainwater harvesting, and outdoor native plants. Construction should begin on the house next year using modified student designs. Chastain said she hopes to get a donated PV system or at least offer one for purchase to prospective homebuyers.

Chastain said she used to live in a 4,000-square-foot passive solar house with solar hot water and her utility bills were half as much as what she paid when she moved into a typical house half that size.

"I feel strongly that medium income homebuyers really need energy efficiency in a home," she said. "And using that location as an educational tool is really a strong part of our grant commitment."

I plan to follow this project and write about it formally once construction starts.

Comments

This article has been closed to new comments. Comments are generally closed after 14 days. However, comments may be closed earlier at the discretion of the News & Record.

Inappropriate content? Please report abuse.

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Illiterati

November 11, 2009 - 6:50 pm EST

This news pleases me to no end. I've been itching to see affordable green homes for quite a while now, but the only green homes on the market typically start around $500k. Frankly, that's not sustainable in the marketplace. I talked to the builder of my house about my idea for an affordable green home, and his answer to that was a $600k house with solar and geothermal that he was putting up. I guess our concepts of affordable aren't quite the same.

I don't see why builders can't build a sub-$200k modular house with the green systems you mention in this post. Skip the fancy finishings like bamboo floors and recycled-glass countertops (why are those so expensive anyway?) and focus on installing sustainable—think off the grid—machinery of the house: electrical, heating/cooling, insulation, rainwater cisterns, etc. Proper siting for passive heating/cooling and landscaping are also important elements, in that stripping off all the trees and topsoil increases cooling costs and promotes erosion and water runoff. Go GTCC!

Morgan Josey Glover

November 12, 2009 - 8:47 am EST

It's good to see that someone is addressing this demographic, even though it's a non-profit project that doesn't reflect typical building scenarios. I also don't believe that green residential building will get far if the home prices don't drop below $200,000. Housing values will be depressed for a long time and many people will not be able to afford that price. However, I also believe a lot of those $500,000 homes are really green McMansions; I would like to see ballpark figures for 1,000 sq ft homes. That being said, a lot can be done relatively inexpensively, especially if you skip the gadgets. That could mean picking a layout that takes advantage of passive solar, installing on-demand water heating systems, putting in quality insulation and energy efficient appliances.

smchastain

November 18, 2009 - 3:19 pm EST

This month USGBC President and CEO Fedrizzi awarded Habitat for Humanity in Phoenix, AZ the first LEED Platinum award for a 1,325 square foot house. Its constructed using insulating concrete forms, solar reflecting concrete roofing tiles and a pv solar roof system. The home is "expected to produce more energy than it consumes". It's a changing world" Habitat Pheonix is also "certifying over 50 other homes in the Phoenix area". We can step it up in Greensboro!

eMail Updates

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Featured Ads

Search

Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us

News & Record Network Sites

User Tools

  • Social Networking
  • RSS
  • Share
  • Sign in to MyNR

Search