Here's a great question that's apparently being asked by U.S. Senators:
Should AT&T be the only service allowed to sell the iPhone?

I still have a pretty low-end Blackberry that I got for free when I switched services. I know some folks who have iPhones and the consensus seems to be that the phone is terrific but the service (in Greensboro, at least) leaves something to be desired.
It is, indeed, bad enough that an artificial economy of overpriced phones "subsidized" by service companies traps users in long-term contracts and that unlike much of the rest of the world many of our phones don't work universally on any service we choose. But what ticks me off is that even if I laid out the ridiculous cost of an unsubsidized iPhone I couldn't choose to have service on it through any company but AT&T without hacking it.
What do you guys think? Have an iPhone? Love or hate the AT&T service?
Not all of the newspaper's content appears online.
*There is a fee for downloading some older articles.